Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same IPM module gave the highest brinjal yield, 81.82 q/ha.

A claim from INTEGRATED MANAEMENT OF BRINJAL SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER, LEUCINODES ORBONALLIS GUEN. · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same IPM module gave the highest brinjal yield, 81.82 q/ha.

Treatment
spinosad + Metarhizium anisoplae + Chelating agent Fe-EDTA+ cartap hydrochloridee1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
81.82q/hae2
Comparator
different IPM modulese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BRINJAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31
e0

“Among different IPM modules tested against shoot and fruit bore, Leucinodes orbonallis Guen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91
e1

“modules M4 using spinosad + Metarhizium anisoplae + Chelating agent Fe-EDTA+ cartap hydrochloride was found most effective causing minimum shoot infestation (7.47%) and fruit infestation of 23.21%, 21.09% and 23.60% at 3rd, 7th and 11th days after spraying respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–362
e2

“giving highest yield (81.82q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–399

Title

INTEGRATED MANAEMENT OF BRINJAL SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER, LEUCINODES ORBONALLIS GUEN.

SHAHID SAMI SIDDIQUE; MOHD ARIF; RAM BABU; et al. THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER 2011. doi:10.58414/scientifictemper.2011.02.1.13

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-7ea0358de5caa9db59a0280017d793c8c421a23f85e3748c2500ccba9475fdf6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Growth and yield attributes were significantly minimum under the T10 integrated nutrient treatment.

    Influence of integrated nutrient management (INM) on growth, yield and quality of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) · 2024

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Combined 150% NPK with Zn+Fe fortified composted coir pith gave higher plant height, branch number and dry matter production in brinjal than other treatments.

    Biofortification of Zinc and Iron through Fortified Organics Along with NPK Levels on the Quality, Nutrient Uptake and Productivity of Brinjal in Coastal Saline Soil · 2023 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

  3. positive
    The fortified treatment produced significantly higher number of branches in brinjal (40.24) than control in both seasons.

    Biofortification of brinjal with zinc and iron through fortified organics optimized NPK and bioactive compounds and their effects on the growth yield and quality of brinjal and on soil properties in coastal saline soil · 2026 · compared with control

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

cartap · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Cartap hydrochloride produced significantly lower fruit yield.

    Effectiveness of different insecticides against sucking pests in brinjal · 2014

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    The IPM module with cartap soil application gave the highest mean fruit yield in brinjal, 247.57 q/ha.

    Field Efficacy of Different IPM Modules Against Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (BSFB) and The Sucking Insect Pests of Brinjal · 2016

    Same direction

  3. positive
    The module gave the maximum yield of 81.82 q/ha.

    Management of brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guen using different IPM modules · 2008

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Cartap hydrochloride yielded 24.93 MT/ha versus 15.03 MT/ha for control.

    Effect of insecticides on insect pests of brinjal. · 2010 · compared with control

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The sequential pesticide schedule produced the highest brinjal fruit yield.

    Effect of pesticidal schedule to control the shoot and fruit borer Leucinodes orbonalis in brinjal · 2015

    Same direction

See all 6 papers →

hydrochloride · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Cartap hydrochloride produced significantly lower fruit yield.

    Effectiveness of different insecticides against sucking pests in brinjal · 2014

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Kinetine, DCPTA and ethanol did not significantly improve eggplant fruit set and yield

    300 Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Yield · 2000 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    The IPM module with cartap soil application gave the highest mean fruit yield in brinjal, 247.57 q/ha.

    Field Efficacy of Different IPM Modules Against Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (BSFB) and The Sucking Insect Pests of Brinjal · 2016

    Same direction

  4. positive
    The module gave the maximum yield of 81.82 q/ha.

    Management of brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guen using different IPM modules · 2008

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Cartap hydrochloride yielded 24.93 MT/ha versus 15.03 MT/ha for control.

    Effect of insecticides on insect pests of brinjal. · 2010 · compared with control

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The sequential pesticide schedule produced the highest brinjal fruit yield.

    Effect of pesticidal schedule to control the shoot and fruit borer Leucinodes orbonalis in brinjal · 2015

    Same direction

See all 7 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.