Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The application gave the highest net returns.

A claim from Effect of nutrient levels on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in tarai region of Uttarakhand · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application gave the highest net returns.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
100 kg N + 40 kg P O + 30 kg K O/hae1
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
37.13 103 /hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns (37.13 103 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–727
e1

“100 kg N + 40 kg P O + 30 kg K O/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–861
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101

Title

Effect of nutrient levels on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in tarai region of Uttarakhand

AMIT KUMAR; B.S. MAHAPATRA; V.P. SINGH; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i3.4127

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-81eb06cfdd6b474e8160aa68973ae30c764372f71c55c5cd2a23e2bb7b28083a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    RH 601 had 15% seed yield reduction under limited N supply relative to normal supply.

    Nitrogen utilization efficiency variability in genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under contrasting N supply · 2019 · compared with normal N supply

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    The number of seeds per siliqua decreased with nitrogen level in Indian mustard.

    RESPONSE OF YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTING TRAITS FOR VARIOUS NITROGEN REGIMES IN INDIAN MUSTARD [BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERN. AND COSS.] · 2021

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Application of 80 kg N/ha significantly improved seed yield of Indian mustard (1.17 and 1.28 tonnes/ha).

    Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under rainfed condition. · 2009

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Foliar FeSO4 + ZnSO4 + urea (FZU) at 45 and 60 DAS gave the maximum increase in Indian mustard grain yield, 27.8%.

    Interactive Effects of Foliar Application of Zinc, Iron and Nitrogen on Productivity and Nutritional Quality of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) · 2021

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Seed yield increased significantly up to 80 kg N/ha.

    Effect of nitrogen application on partitioning of biomass, seed yield and harvest index in contrasting genotypes of oilseed brassicas , · 2001

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Nitrogen 80 kg/ha with sulphur 60 kg/ha gave the highest seed yield, 2,109 kg/ha on pooled basis.

    Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth, yield attributes and seed yield of mustard (Brasska juncea) in eastern plains of Rajasthan · 2004

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Stover and biological yields increased significantly up to 120 kg N/ha.

    Yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) as influenced by nitrogen levels and its split application in arid western Rajasthan · 2001

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Increasing nutrients up to the highest dose significantly increased height and dry matter.

    Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, quality and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in arid zone of Rajasthan · 2001

    Same direction

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.