Paper · 2004 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth, yield attributes and seed yield of mustard (Brasska juncea) in eastern plains of Rajasthan

Amar Singh; N.L. Meena

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 1996–97 and 1997–98 at Agricultural Research Sub Station, Kumher (Bharatpur), to study the effect of N and S on seed yield, plant height, primary and secondary branches and dry-matter accumulation of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]. Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/ha significantly increased siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, length of siliqua and test weight of seeds and also resulted in highest seed (2,109 kg/ha) yield on pooled basis. On pooled basis, optimum dose of N and S was 88.24 and 74.86 kg/ha respectively. N@ 80 kg/ha resulted net income and benefit: cost ratio of Rs 15,799/ha and 2.69, respectively, during the first year and Rs 18,193/ha and 2.87 during the second year. Sulphur 60 kg/ha gave a net income of Rs 14,774/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.95 during the first year and Rs 17,058/ha and 2.76 during the second year. The increase in N uptake under 40, 60, and 80 kg N/ha was 30, 57 and 74% respectively, over the control (20 kg N/ha), whereas it was 17, 28 and 34% under 20, 40 and 60 kg S/ha. Content (%) of N and S, in seed stalk increased with the increas in N and S levels. The residual available N and S also improved with the increasing N and S application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 80 kg/ha with sulphur 60 kg/ha significantly increased siliquae per plant and seeds per siliqua.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/hae1
Outcome
siliquae/plant, seeds/siliquae1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/ha significantly increased siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, length of siliqua and test weight of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 80 kg/ha with sulphur 60 kg/ha significantly increased siliqua length and seed test weight.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/hae1
Outcome
length of siliqua and test weight of seedse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/ha significantly increased siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, length of siliqua and test weight of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 80 kg/ha with sulphur 60 kg/ha gave the highest seed yield, 2,109 kg/ha on pooled basis.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/hae1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
2,109 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen @ 80 kg/ha + S @ 60 kg/ha significantly increased siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, length of siliqua and test weight of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–449 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in highest seed (2,109 kg/ha) yield on pooled basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–519 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum dose of nitrogen on pooled basis was 88.24 kg/ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
optimum dosee3
Value
88.24e3
Qualifier
of Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e3

“On pooled basis, optimum dose of N and S was 88.24 and 74.86 kg/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum dose of sulphur on pooled basis was 74.86 kg/ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
optimum dosee3
Value
74.86 kg/hae3
Qualifier
and Se3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e3

“On pooled basis, optimum dose of N and S was 88.24 and 74.86 kg/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 80 kg/ha gave a net income of Rs 15,799/ha and benefit:cost ratio 2.69 in the first year.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
N@ 80 kg/hae4
Outcome
net income and benefit: cost ratioe4
Value
Rs 15,799/ha and 2.69e4
Qualifier
during the first yeare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e4

“N@ 80 kg/ha resulted net income and benefit: cost ratio of Rs 15,799/ha and 2.69, respectively, during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur 60 kg/ha gave a net income of Rs 14,774/ha and benefit:cost ratio 2.95 in the first year.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Sulphur 60 kg/hae5
Outcome
net incomee5
Value
Rs 14,774/hae5
Qualifier
during the first yeare5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur 60 kg/ha gave a net income of Rs 14,774/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.95 during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake increased by 30, 57 and 74% under 40, 60 and 80 kg N/ha over the control.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
40, 60, and 80 kg N/hae6
Outcome
N uptakee6
Direction
increasee6
Value
30, 57 and 74%e6
Comparator
control (20 kg N/ha)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e6

“The increase in N uptake under 40, 60, and 80 kg N/ha was 30, 57 and 74% respectively, over the control (20 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake increased by 17, 28 and 34% under 20, 40 and 60 kg S/ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
20, 40 and 60 kg S/hae7
Outcome
N uptakee6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
17, 28 and 34%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e6

“The increase in N uptake under 40, 60, and 80 kg N/ha was 30, 57 and 74% respectively, over the control (20 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1038 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas it was 17, 28 and 34% under 20, 40 and 60 kg S/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1097 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Content of N and S in seed stalk increased with increasing N and S levels.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
N and S levelse7
Outcome
Content (%) of N and S, in seed stalke7
Direction
increasede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e7

“Content (%) of N and S, in seed stalk increased with the increas in N and S levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual available N and S in soil improved with increasing N and S application.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
increasing N and S applicatione7
Outcome
residual available N and Se7
Direction
improvede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L). Czernj. & Cosson]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–315 · show in text ↑
e7

“The residual available N and S also improved with the increasing N and S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1267 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.