Intervention effectmodel-written summary

F₃S₃V₁ produced the highest marketable yield at 1.65 kg/plant.

A claim from Synergistic Effects of N P K Fertilizer Regimes and Plant Spacing on Morphological and Biochemical Traits of Bacterial Wilt-resistant Tomato Lines (Solanum lycopersicum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F₃S₃V₁ produced the highest marketable yield at 1.65 kg/plant.

Material
DPT 1e0
Treatment
F₃S₃V₁ treatment (125% NPK, 75 cm×45 cm spacing, DPT 1)e0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.65 kg/plante0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest marketable yield (1.65 kg/plant) was achieved in the F₃S₃V₁ treatment (125% NPK, 75 cm×45 cm spacing, DPT 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1962
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–140

Title

Synergistic Effects of N P K Fertilizer Regimes and Plant Spacing on Morphological and Biochemical Traits of Bacterial Wilt-resistant Tomato Lines (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Tamanna Bhagta; Sanjay Chadha; Sheetal Thakur; et al. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 2025. doi:10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i72574

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-83400a769c47bde808c5c9aefe93b427ae5e451f933e7268e52a4168ca53a003 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Higher density reduced fruit number, marketable yield and total yield per tomato plant.

    Response of Field-Grown Indeterminate Tomato to Plant Density and Stem Pruning on Yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Plant density did not affect tomato fruit color.

    Influence of Plant Density on Yield and Quality in Tomatoes Under Greenhouse Conditions in the Northwest on Mexico · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Seeding rates above 63 seeds/m did not significantly increase marketable transplant number.

    Effect of Seeding Rate, Pattern, Row Position, and Clipping on Size Uniformity of Field-grown Tomato Transplants1 · 1979

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Fifty centimeter spacing produced higher marketable tomato yield of 82.39 t/ha.

    EFFECT OF SPACING AND STEM PRUNING ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO · 2007 · compared with closer spacing

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Density and fertilizer combinations positively influenced height, fruit yield and marketable yield.

    Effects of planting density and NPK fertilizer application on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycospersicon esculentum Mill) in forest location. · 2009

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Plant spacing significantly affected total and marketable fruit yields and % marketable fruit yield.

    Response of tomato cultivars differing in growth habit to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and spacing on vertisol in Ethiopia · 2008

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The 20 cm interrow spacing increased marketable fruit yield by 35.96% compared with the 30 cm spacing used by farmers.

    Effect of Plant Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in Shewarobit, Central Ethiopia · 2020 · compared with 30 cm spacing

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Marketable yield increased with plant density in spring/summer, peaking at 25 plants/m2.

    Yield of determinate tomato cultivars grown in a closed hydroponic system as affected by plant spacing · 2017

    Same direction

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Compost showed no effect on fruit colour.

    Effects of forms and rates of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilisers on the yield and some quality indices of tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) · 1990

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Manurial treatment did not entirely eliminate blotchy ripening.

    SOME NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS OF THE TOMATO · 1926

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    In 2007, marketable tomato yield with F1 fertilizer was similar to the control.

    Effect of different organic fertilizers on yield and fruit quality of ındeterminate tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) · 2011 · compared with control application

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    CRF-NPK at 168 kg/ha N reduced season total large and total marketable tomato yields in 2012.

    Effects of Controlled-release Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate, Placement, Source, and Release Duration on Tomato Grown with Seepage Irrigation in Florida · 2014 · compared with UF/IFAS rate and grower standard treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    EBM fruit had maximum physiological weight loss.

    Effect of pre-harvest applications of organic manure and calcium chloride on the storability of tomato fruits · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    The W/O treatment delayed fruit ripening compared with the W treatment.

    Effects of Nutrient Solution Management and Environment on Tomato in Small-scale Hydroponics · 2020 · compared with the W treatment

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Manure and NP fertiliser did not significantly influence marketable or total yield.

    Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato · 2010

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Standard nutrient solution produced significantly lower marketable tomato yield than reduced solution.

    Effect of mycorrhizal colonization and nutrient solutions concentration on the yielding and chemical composition of tomato grown in rockwool and straw medium · 2015 · compared with reduced solution (R)

    Opposite direction

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.