Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 8 g L -1 iron sulphate rate produced the highest thousand grain weight, harvest index, grain yield and carbohydrate yield, followed by 2 g L -1 nano iron oxide.

A claim from Effect of foliar application of nano-iron oxidase, iron chelate and iron sulphate rates on yield and quality of wheat. · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 8 g L -1 iron sulphate rate produced the highest thousand grain weight, harvest index, grain yield and carbohydrate yield, followed by 2 g L -1 nano iron oxide.

Taxon
bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
8 g L -1 iron sulphatee0
Outcome
1000-grain weight, harvest index, grain and grain carbohydrate yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Comparator
2 g L -1 of nano-iron oxidee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest 1000-grain weight, harvest index, grain and grain carbohydrate yields were produced by application of 8 g L -1 iron sulphate followed by application of 2 g L -1 of nano-iron oxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–987
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–461

Title

Effect of foliar application of nano-iron oxidase, iron chelate and iron sulphate rates on yield and quality of wheat.

Hamideh Ghafari; Jamshid Razmjoo International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 2013

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-841b9d3c201f55444f2b98fc455858771d1bb9d87283c0a9d7d917e35b13eee5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.