Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Phosphorus, Zinc and Iron on Yield and Quality of Wheat in Western Rajasthan, India

Ram Chandar Jat; Yogesh Sharma; R.K. Jakhar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Loamy sand soils of Western Rajasthan with ten treatments comprising 4 levels of phosphorus (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg ha-1) and zinc (0, 3 and 6 kg ha-1) in main plots and 3 levels of iron (0, 3 and 6 kg ha-1) in split-plot design with three replications. Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 significant]y increased the grain, straw and biological yields beyond which it increased non-significantly and registered a mean increase of 26.2, 30.6 and 28.8 per cent, respectively over control. Application of phosphorus @ 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, 3 kg Zn ha-1 and of 6 kg Fe ha-1 significantly increased the chlorophyll content of wheat at flowering stage and protein content of grains in wheat during both the years of investigations and in pooled analysis. Whereas, Application of higher doses of phosphorus, zinc and iron did not had significant effect on total sugar content of grain and crude fibre content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 per ha significantly increased wheat grain yield by 26.2% over control.

Treatment
Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1e1
Outcome
graine1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26.2e1
Qualifier
mean increasee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 significant]y increased the grain, straw and biological yields beyond which it increased non-significantly and registered a mean increase of 26.2, 30.6 and 28.8 per cent, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 per ha significantly increased wheat straw yield by 30.6% over control.

Treatment
Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1e1
Outcome
strawe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30.6e1
Qualifier
mean increasee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 significant]y increased the grain, straw and biological yields beyond which it increased non-significantly and registered a mean increase of 26.2, 30.6 and 28.8 per cent, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 per ha significantly increased wheat biological yield by 28.8% over control.

Treatment
Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1e1
Outcome
biological yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
28.8e1
Qualifier
mean increasee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of phosphorus up to 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 significant]y increased the grain, straw and biological yields beyond which it increased non-significantly and registered a mean increase of 26.2, 30.6 and 28.8 per cent, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus 40 kg, zinc 3 kg and iron 6 kg per ha significantly increased wheat chlorophyll content at flowering stage.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee2
Treatment
Application of phosphorus @ 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, 3 kg Zn ha-1 and of 6 kg Fe ha-1e2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of phosphorus @ 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, 3 kg Zn ha-1 and of 6 kg Fe ha-1 significantly increased the chlorophyll content of wheat at flowering stage and protein content of grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus 40 kg, zinc 3 kg and iron 6 kg per ha significantly increased protein content of wheat grains.

Organ / stage
grainse2
Treatment
Application of phosphorus @ 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, 3 kg Zn ha-1 and of 6 kg Fe ha-1e2
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of phosphorus @ 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, 3 kg Zn ha-1 and of 6 kg Fe ha-1 significantly increased the chlorophyll content of wheat at flowering stage and protein content of grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher doses of phosphorus, zinc and iron did not significantly affect total sugar content of grain or crude fibre content of wheat.

Treatment
higher doses of phosphorus, zinc and irone3
Outcome
total sugar content of grain and crude fibre contente3
Direction
did not had significant effecte3
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner to find out the effect of phosphorus, zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“Whereas, Application of higher doses of phosphorus, zinc and iron did not had significant effect on total sugar content of grain and crude fibre content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1214 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Low phosphorus caused starch accumulation in all genotypes.

    Differential responses of root and root hair traits of spring wheat genotypes to phosphorus deficiency in solution culture · 2016 · compared with abundant phosphorus (P) (200 μmol)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.