Paper · 1997 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Correlation of the Olsen phosphorus soil test: Spring wheat response

G. D. Jackson; G. D. Kushnak; G. R. Carlson; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Spring wheat producers in central and north central Montana are lacking information to interpret the Olsen phosphorus (P) soil test. This study was conducted to evaluate spring wheat P response and the Olsen P soil test. Field experiments were conducted at 29 cultivated fallow, 5 no‐till fallow, 16 no‐till recrop, and 2 cultivated recrop locations from 1986 to 1995. Phosphorus treatments ranging from 0 to 29 kg P/ha were applied on sites with Olsen P soil tests varying from 4 to 37 mg/kg. Grain yield, protein, and test weight responses were measured. Yields fluctuated from 1082 to 6270 kg/ha and P response from 0 to 1210 kg/ha. A Cate‐Nelson plot of the response data confirmed the current critical level of 16 mg/kg, but P fertilizer recommendations were adjusted. Multiple regression was utilized to develop a highly significant P response equation Y = ‐11.18 + 67.672 P ‐ 1.22 P2 ‐0.98 (P x ST), R2 = 0.55 where Y = grain yield response (kg/ha), P. = P rate (kg/ha), and ST = Olsen P soil test (mg/kg). Grain test weight and protein content were generally unaffected by P except protein was depressed at several environments with high yields and high P soil tests. Growers should use a P starter fertilizer regardless of soil test.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yields ranged from 1082 to 6270 kg/ha.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Value
1082 to 6270 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields fluctuated from 1082 to 6270 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat phosphorus yield response ranged from 0 to 1210 kg/ha.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
P responsee0
Value
0 to 1210 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P response from 0 to 1210 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A Cate‐Nelson plot confirmed the 16 mg/kg Olsen P critical level.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
critical levele0
Value
16 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A Cate‐Nelson plot of the response data confirmed the current critical level of 16 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The multiple-regression equation for wheat yield response was highly significant with R2 = 0.55.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
P response equatione0
Value
R2 = 0.55e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple regression was utilized to develop a highly significant P response equation Y = ‐11.18 + 67.672 P ‐ 1.22 P2 ‐0.98 (P x ST), R2 = 0.55”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus generally did not affect wheat grain test weight.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
Grain test weighte0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain test weight and protein content were generally unaffected by P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus generally did not affect wheat grain protein content.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain test weight and protein content were generally unaffected by P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus depressed wheat protein at several high-yield, high-soil-P environments.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
depressede0
Setting
environments with high yields and high P soil testse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein was depressed at several environments with high yields and high P soil tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend P starter fertilizer regardless of soil test.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
use a P starter fertilizer regardless of soil teste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growers should use a P starter fertilizer regardless of soil test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.