Paper · 1988 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Iron and zinc fertilization with reference to the grain quality oftriticum aestivumL.

A. Hemantaranjan; O. K. Garg

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Iron + Zinc (applied to the soil as ferrous sulphate and zinc sulphate) were found to significantly increase the number ear heads per tiller, length of ear heads, number of grains per ear, grain yield per plant and the weight 1000 grains in proportion to its concentration used both in pot and field experiments. This was coupled with the increase in total carbohydrate, starch and crude protein contents of wheat grains. All these activities were found optimum at the identical concentration of Fe + Zn (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil). A further increase in the exogenous iron and zinc concentrations (up to 12.5 mg kg‐1 soil) led to the sharp decline of all these activities near the control level. Yield characters were observed to be better supported in the field condition than in pot cultures. Since natural availability of iron and zinc in the soil are only 2–4 mg kg‐1 soil and 0.60 mg kg‐1 soil, respectively, it is apparently suggested that the threshold level of iron and zinc (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil) has a definite role in the synthesis of carbohydrates, starch and protein contents in the wheat grains. It is further suggested that normal metabolism might be reasonably hindered due to an increased uptakability of Fe and Zn at their higher concentrations (@ 10 mg kg‐1 soil and 12.5 mg kg‐1 soil, respectively). This causes a reduction in the synthesis of chlorophyll and indole‐3‐acetic acid, leading to an inhibition of photosynthesis at grain filling stage and ultimately reduced total carbohydrate, starch and protein contents of grains, which might be a good reason for the production of inferior quality of wheat grains. The positive role of the threshold concentration (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil) of exogenous iron and zinc in the growth and yield potentiality of wheat crop is, therefore, emphasized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron and zinc significantly increased ear heads per tiller, ear head length and grains per ear with concentration.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Treatment
Iron + Zince0
Outcome
number ear heads per tiller, length of ear heads, number of grains per eare0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Iron + Zinc (applied to the soil as ferrous sulphate and zinc sulphate) were found to significantly increase the number ear heads per tiller, length of ear heads, number of grains per ear, grain yield per plant and the weight 1000 grains in proportion to its concentration used both in pot and field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron and zinc significantly increased grain yield per plant and 1000 grain weight.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Treatment
Iron + Zince0
Outcome
grain yield per plant and the weight 1000 grainse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Iron + Zinc (applied to the soil as ferrous sulphate and zinc sulphate) were found to significantly increase the number ear heads per tiller, length of ear heads, number of grains per ear, grain yield per plant and the weight 1000 grains in proportion to its concentration used both in pot and field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain carbohydrate, starch and crude protein content increased with the fertilization.

Treatment
Iron and zinc fertilizationt0
Outcome
total carbohydrate, starch and crude protein contents of wheat grainse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was coupled with the increase in total carbohydrate, starch and crude protein contents of wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron and zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured responses were optimal at 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil iron plus zinc.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Treatment
Fe + Zn (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil)e0
Outcome
activitiese0
Direction
optimume0

Verbatim

e0

“All these activities were found optimum at the identical concentration of Fe + Zn (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising iron and zinc to 12.5 mg kg‐1 soil sharply reduced the measured responses near control.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Treatment
exogenous iron and zinc concentrations (up to 12.5 mg kg‐1 soil)e0
Outcome
all these activitiese0
Direction
sharp declinee0
Comparator
control levele0

Verbatim

e0

“A further increase in the exogenous iron and zinc concentrations (up to 12.5 mg kg‐1 soil) led to the sharp decline of all these activities near the control level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield characters were better in field conditions than pot culture.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Outcome
Yield characterse0
Direction
better supportede0
Comparator
pot culturese0
Setting
field conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield characters were observed to be better supported in the field condition than in pot cultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil iron and zinc supports wheat grain carbohydrate, starch and protein synthesis.

Treatment
iron and zinc (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil)e0
Outcome
synthesis of carbohydrates, starch and protein contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the threshold level of iron and zinc (@ 7.5 mg kg‐1 soil) has a definite role in the synthesis of carbohydrates, starch and protein contents in the wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1109 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest higher iron and zinc uptake may hinder normal metabolism.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Compound
Fe and Zne0
Outcome
normal metabolisme0
Qualifier
increased uptakability of Fe and Zne0

Verbatim

e0

“normal metabolism might be reasonably hindered due to an increased uptakability of Fe and Zn at their higher concentrations (@ 10 mg kg‐1 soil and 12.5 mg kg‐1 soil, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest higher concentrations reduce chlorophyll and indole‐3‐acetic acid synthesis.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Outcome
synthesis of chlorophyll and indole‐3‐acetic acide0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
This causes a reductione0

Verbatim

e0

“This causes a reduction in the synthesis of chlorophyll and indole‐3‐acetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest photosynthesis is inhibited at grain filling under higher concentrations.

Taxon
triticum aestivumL.t0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Qualifier
inhibition of photosynthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“leading to an inhibition of photosynthesis at grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticum aestivumL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest higher concentrations lower carbohydrate, starch and protein contents and grain quality.

Outcome
total carbohydrate, starch and protein contents of grainse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
inferior quality of wheat grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ultimately reduced total carbohydrate, starch and protein contents of grains, which might be a good reason for the production of inferior quality of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1634 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.