Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under potassium and zinc nutrition

VINAY SINGH; JAVED ALI; SEEMA; et al.

17
claims
28
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 201011 and 201112 at Bichpuri, Agra , Uttar Pradesh on sandy-loam soil, to assess the effect of potassium and zinc nutrition on wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]. Treatments comprising 4 levels each of K (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg K O/ha) and Zn (0, 3, 6 2 and 9 kg/ha) were evaluated in randomized complete-block design with 3 replications. Growth and yield param- eters of wheat increased significantly with the increasing levels of K up to 60 kg K O/ha which were statistically at 2 par with 90 kg K O/ha. The mean grain (5.31 t/ha) and straw yields (9.80 t/ha) with 60 kg K O/ha were 15.4 and 2 2 13.7% higher than the control, respectively. Application of 60 kg K O/ha resulted in significantly highest net returns 2 ( 48.1 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.90). Increasing zinc levels up to 6 kg Zn/ha showed significant improve- ment in plant height, effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weight over the control. Similarly, application of 6 kg Zn /ha resulted in 8.8% higher grain yield (5.22 t/ha) than the yield obtained in the control (4.80 t/ha). Signifi- cantly highest net returns ( 47.8 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratios (1.95) were recorded at 6 kg Zn/ha. Uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn in wheat crop increased significantly with increasing levels of potassium. Protein content and yield in wheat grain increased significantly with the addition of K O up to 90 kg/ha and Zn up to 9 kg/ha. The nutri- 2 ent uptake (N, K and Zn) in wheat, except those of P and S, increased significantly up to 6 kg Zn/ha. The effi- ciency indices decreased at higher doses of K and Zn and the maximum values were recorded at 60 kg K O/ha 2 and 6 kg Zn/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium increased wheat growth and yield parameters significantly through 60 kg K O/ha, statistically on par with 90 kg K O/ha.

Treatment
60 kg K O/hae0
Outcome
Growth and yield param- eterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
90 kg K O/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and yield param- eters of wheat increased significantly with the increasing levels of K up to 60 kg K O/ha which were statistically at 2 par with 90 kg K O/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg K O/ha, wheat grain yield was 5.31 t/ha, 15.4% above control.

Treatment
60 kg K O/hae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.31 t/hae0
Qualifier
15.4e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean grain (5.31 t/ha) and straw yields (9.80 t/ha) with 60 kg K O/ha were 15.4 and 2 2 13.7% higher than the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg K O/ha, wheat straw yield was 9.80 t/ha, reported 13.7% above control.

Treatment
60 kg K O/hae0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.80 t/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean grain (5.31 t/ha) and straw yields (9.80 t/ha) with 60 kg K O/ha were 15.4 and 2 2 13.7% higher than the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium at 60 kg K O/ha gave the highest net returns.

Treatment
60 kg K O/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48.1 103/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg K O/ha resulted in significantly highest net returns 2 ( 48.1 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium at 60 kg K O/ha gave a benefit: cost ratio of 1.90.

Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Value
1.90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit: cost ratio (1.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc through 6 kg Zn/ha significantly improved wheat height, effective tillers and grains per spike over control.

Treatment
6 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
plant height, effective tillers, grains/spikee0
Direction
improve- mente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing zinc levels up to 6 kg Zn/ha showed significant improve- ment in plant height, effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weight over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc through 6 kg Zn/ha significantly improved wheat 1,000-grain weight over control.

Treatment
6 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
1,000-grain weighte0
Direction
improve- mente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing zinc levels up to 6 kg Zn/ha showed significant improve- ment in plant height, effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-grain weight over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 kg Zn/ha, wheat grain yield was 5.22 t/ha, 8.8% higher than control.

Treatment
6 kg Zn /hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.22 t/hae0
Qualifier
4.80 t/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 6 kg Zn /ha resulted in 8.8% higher grain yield (5.22 t/ha) than the yield obtained in the control (4.80 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 kg Zn/ha, wheat net returns were reported as highest.

Treatment
6 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.8 103/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Signifi- cantly highest net returns ( 47.8 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratios (1.95) were recorded at 6 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 kg Zn/ha, wheat benefit: cost ratio was 1.95.

Treatment
6 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratiose0
Value
1.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit: cost ratios (1.95) were recorded at 6 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium significantly increased wheat uptake of N, P and K.

Treatment
increasing levels of potassiume0
Outcome
Uptake of N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn in wheat crop increased significantly with increasing levels of potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium significantly increased wheat uptake of S and Zn.

Treatment
increasing levels of potassiume0
Outcome
S and Zne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn in wheat crop increased significantly with increasing levels of potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium additions through 90 kg/ha significantly increased wheat grain protein content and yield.

Treatment
K O up to 90 kg/hae0
Outcome
Protein content and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and yield in wheat grain increased significantly with the addition of K O up to 90 kg/ha and Zn up to 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc additions through 9 kg/ha significantly increased wheat grain protein content and yield.

Treatment
Zn up to 9 kg/hae0
Outcome
Protein content and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and yield in wheat grain increased significantly with the addition of K O up to 90 kg/ha and Zn up to 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat uptake of N, K and Zn significantly increased through 6 kg Zn/ha.

Treatment
6 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
ent uptake (N, K and Zn)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutri- 2 ent uptake (N, K and Zn) in wheat, except those of P and S, increased significantly up to 6 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1605 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat P and S uptake were exceptions to the significant increase with zinc through 6 kg Zn/ha.

Treatment
6 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
P and Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except those of P and S, increased significantly up to 6 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficiency indices declined at higher potassium and zinc doses, peaking at 60 kg K O/ha and 6 kg Zn/ha.

Treatment
higher doses of K and Zne0
Outcome
effi- ciency indicese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
60 kg K O/ha 2 and 6 kg Zn/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effi- ciency indices decreased at higher doses of K and Zn and the maximum values were recorded at 60 kg K O/ha 2 and 6 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–72 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.