Intervention effectmodel-written summary

available P in soil was higher after INM or FYM-only practice than fertilizer-only practice.

A claim from Productivity, profitability and sustainability of integrated nutrient management practices in yam (Dioscorea esculenta)+maize (Zea mays) intercropping system. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

available P in soil was higher after INM or FYM-only practice than fertilizer-only practice.

Taxon
yamt0
Treatment
INM practices and Farmers Practice of FYM onlye0
Outcome
available P in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
application of chemical fertilizer onlye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“INM practices and Farmers Practice of FYM only recorded higher organic carbon content and available P in soil as compared to application of chemical fertilizer only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1474
t0

“yam (Dioscorea esculenta)+maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–136

Title

Productivity, profitability and sustainability of integrated nutrient management practices in yam (Dioscorea esculenta)+maize (Zea mays) intercropping system.

Biswaranjan Behera; SK Mohanty; Akhilesh Mishra Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 2010

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-842d4e096e8ecedf5cb10f6593a6948fa4c6d9c677ad1ca4e7beb9628a6809cc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: chemistry · DioscoreaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.