Claim · model-written summary
Soil water content under NT was higher than under CT in the 0–90 cm soil layer.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- NTe1
- Outcome
- soil water contente1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- 0~90 cm soil layere1
- Comparator
- conventional tillage(CT)e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“their effects on corn yield in Northeast China”
e1“compared to conventional tillage(CT),soil water content under NT was higher in 0~90 cm soil layer”
Title
Xingyi Zhang Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2012
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Association Soil water content showed no difference between NT and CT at 190 cm depth.
- Association Soil water storage was mainly influenced by rainfall and soil tillage.
- Association Soil water storage was lower in windy and rainless spring and autumn.
- Observation The soil water storage order changed to RTNTCT in rainy summer season.
- Intervention effect LAI under NT was 0.22 lower than under CT.
- Intervention effect LAI under NT was 0.26 lower than under RT.
- Association Evapotranspiration in RT during the growing season was the highest among the tillage systems.
- Intervention effect Corn grain yield under CT was 30% higher than under NT.
- Intervention effect WUE under CT was 17% higher than under NT.
- Intervention effect Corn grain yield under CT was 29% higher than under RT.
- Intervention effect WUE under CT was 11% higher than under RT.
- Observation Corn grain yield differed significantly among the three tillage systems.
- Recommendation NT and RT are infeasible for corn production, and CT remains the undeniable soil tillage practice in this region.