Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring wheat yield under strip irrigation was 0.77 t/ha below furrow irrigation.

A claim from Influence of irrigation methods on agrophysical properties and productivity of dark chestnut soils of dry steppe on the left bank of the Volga river · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat yield under strip irrigation was 0.77 t/ha below furrow irrigation.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigation in stripse2
Outcome
spring wheat yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.77 t/hae0
Comparator
furrow irrigatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring wheat yield decrease makes 0.55 t/ha and 0.77 t/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1109
e1

“as compared to sprinkling and furrow irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1036
e2

“after irrigation in strips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–987

Title

Influence of irrigation methods on agrophysical properties and productivity of dark chestnut soils of dry steppe on the left bank of the Volga river

Victor Korsak; Nina Pronko; Olga Karpova; et al. Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications 2021. doi:10.37622/adsa/16.1.2021.121-132

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-87102b6a1393fc32c9bd312b8be8e3dae0419c13105830d2e2862ee20b4d9875 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.