Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat biomass responded more strongly to Mn fertilizer than oat, especially Chuanmai 28.

A claim from Effects of Mn Fertilizer on Different Wheat and Oat Cultivars at Seedling Stage · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat biomass responded more strongly to Mn fertilizer than oat, especially Chuanmai 28.

Material
Chuanmai 28e0
Treatment
Mn fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
wheat biomasse0
Direction
obviouse0
Comparator
oate0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of Mn fertilizer application on wheat biomass was obvious as compared with oat,especially Chuanmai 28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–447

Title

Effects of Mn Fertilizer on Different Wheat and Oat Cultivars at Seedling Stage

Zhang Fu-suo Guangdong nongye kexue 2009

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-893f94a5bcf6679bcc8cf5112bc031e67c766ccf1ff5412f34789fd3b461bb52 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Mild Mn toxicity reduced top dry weight.

    Manganese Deficiency and Toxicity Effects on Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll, and Transpiration in Wheat1 · 1985

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Rising solution Mn reduced shoot and root dry weight more in Columbus than Norquay and Cascades.

    Variation of tolerance to manganese toxicity in Australian hexaploid wheat · 2009 · compared with Norquay and Cascades

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Wheat grew little at 10% of control manganese supply, while barley grass was moderately constrained.

    Growth and Photosynthetic Responses to Manganese and Copper Deficiencies in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and Barley Grass ( Hordeum glaucum and H. leporinum ) · 1988 · compared with barley grass

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Low Mn decreased Jingdong 8 stem and leaf dry weight significantly.

    Studies of Mn Deficiency on Some Physiological Effects of Wheat Genotypes · 2004

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Wheat IDH activity decreased as manganese exposure time increased.

    The Short Term Effects of Manganese Toxicity on Isocitrate Dehydrogenase in Wheat & Tobacco · 1988

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Manganese seed coating had no effect on plant development or seedling dry weight of winter wheat compared with uncoated seeds.

    No effect of manganese coating or seed content · 2019 · compared with uncoated

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Manganese stress reduced wheat seedling height and weight.

    Novel Insights Into Manganese Toxicity Mitigation: Biogenic Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles Boost Antioxidant Defense and Gene Expression in Wheat · 2025

    Opposite direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Reducing fertilizer by 25% did not reduce soil nutrient availability or wheat nutrient content, height and dry weight.

    Beneficial bacteria activate nutrients and promote wheat growth under conditions of reduced fertilizer application · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Gibberellic acid reduced root dry weight of wheat, unless applied to the shoots in a lanolin paste.

    The plant‐growth‐promoting properties of gibberellic acid, a metabolic product of the fungus gibberella fujikuroi · 1954

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    fertilizer N rate had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Stagnant solution reduced Gamenya shoot fresh weight by 21%.

    Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to waterlogging · 1992 · compared with aerated plants

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Urea fertilizer impurities such as biuret do not account for the adverse effect on seed germination in soil.

    Evidence that the adverse effect of urea fertilizer on seed germination in soil is due to ammonia formed through hydrolysis of urea by soil urease · 1989

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Applying more N fertilizer did not improve DM accumulation in winter wheat.

    Understanding Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation with Time-Course for High-Yielding Wheat Production in China · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization did not significantly change rooting pattern.

    Root Development of Winter Wheat as Related to Tillage Practice in Western Nebraska1 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen fertiliser application did not affect wheat rooting depth.

    Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee · 1990

    Opposite direction

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.