Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sewage sludge had a higher residual effect on succeeding maize.

A claim from An efficient nutrient management system for a groundnut Arachis hypogaeamaize Zea mays L cropping system in Karnataka India 183 · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge had a higher residual effect on succeeding maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sewage sludgee0
Outcome
residual effect on succeeding maize crope0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“composted poultry manure, sewage sludge, and enriched urban garbage compost had higher residual effect on succeeding maize crop in groundnut-maize cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–818

Title

An efficient nutrient management system for a groundnut Arachis hypogaeamaize Zea mays L cropping system in Karnataka India 183

S. S. L. Reddy; B. Shivaraj; V. C. Reddy; et al. Tropical Agriculture 2016

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-89905e4fc6abcbc3256b9b0b963c87a901afc147c5d67a73bd6663f479f37d06 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

organic · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    When crop residue was removed, the N requirement of hybrid maize increased to 160 kg N ha−1 compared with 40% retention.

    Crop and Residue Management Improves Productivity and Profitability of Rice–Maize System in Salt-Affected Rainfed Lowlands of East India · 2020 · compared with partially (40%) retained

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Residue application did not affect maize yield.

    Impact of irrigation and crop residue management on maize (Zea mays)– chickpea (Cicer arietinum) sequence under no tillage conditions · 2014

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Mulch had no effect on sweet corn with standard irrigation.

    Maize in a lowland rice system: improving water productivity in a Lao context · 2012

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Corn responded more to sludge placed 5 cm than 15 cm from rows, with 10 cm intermediate.

    Precision Placement of Separated Dairy Sludge Improves Early Phosphorus Nutrition and Growth in Corn (Zea mays L.) · 2012 · compared with 15 cm

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Residue retention in strip tillage increased maize yield by 14.0%.

    Conservation tillage and residue management improve soil health and crop productivity—Evidence from a rice-maize cropping system in Bangladesh · 2022 · compared with CT

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Straw and residual plastic mulching produced greater maximum biomass rates of wheat and maize than conventional intercropping.

    Growth trajectories of wheat–maize intercropping with straw and plastic management in arid conditions · 2020 · compared with conventional intercropping

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Legume residue benefited subsequent maize.

    INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN POTATO BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS FOR EASTERN INDO-GANGATIC PLAINS OF INDIA · 2009

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Farmyard manure plus dust and straw mulch significantly improved maize equivalent versus no mulch.

    Effect of moisture-conservation practices on productivity and water use in maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions · 2001 · compared with no mulch

    Same direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.