Abstract
An investigation was carried out during 2001-2003 at Regional Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India, to study the effect of different organic manures on groundnut and their residual effect on maize in groundnut-maize cropping system. Application of organic manures, viz., composted poultry manure or sewage sludge or enriched urban garbage compost at the rate equal to recommended N to groundnut and inorganic NPK fertilizers to maize based on Soil Test Crop Response for targeted yield approach recorded higher net returns (U.S. $1459.00 ha-1) and benefit:cost ratio (3.40). Among different organic manures, composted poultry manure, sewage sludge, and enriched urban garbage compost had higher residual effect on succeeding maize crop in groundnut-maize cropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manures applied to groundnut with inorganic NPK to maize produced higher net returns of U.S. $1459.00 ha-1.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- organic manurese0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- U.S. $1459.00 ha-1e0
- Setting
- maizee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of organic manures, viz., composted poultry manure or sewage sludge or enriched urban garbage compost at the rate equal to recommended N to groundnut and inorganic NPK fertilizers to maize based on Soil Test Crop Response for targeted yield approach recorded higher net returns (U.S. $1459.00 ha-1) and benefit:cost ratio (3.40).”
t0“groundnut Arachis hypogaeamaize Zea mays L”
Claim · model-written summary
The nutrient management system produced a benefit:cost ratio of 3.40.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- benefit:cost ratioe0
- Value
- 3.40e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded higher net returns (U.S. $1459.00 ha-1) and benefit:cost ratio (3.40)”
t0“groundnut Arachis hypogaeamaize Zea mays L”
Claim · model-written summary
Composted poultry manure had a higher residual effect on succeeding maize.
- Treatment
- composted poultry manuree0
- Outcome
- residual effect on succeeding maize crope0
- Direction
- highere0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“composted poultry manure, sewage sludge, and enriched urban garbage compost had higher residual effect on succeeding maize crop in groundnut-maize cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Sewage sludge had a higher residual effect on succeeding maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“composted poultry manure, sewage sludge, and enriched urban garbage compost had higher residual effect on succeeding maize crop in groundnut-maize cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched urban garbage compost had a higher residual effect on succeeding maize.
- Treatment
- enriched urban garbage composte0
- Outcome
- residual effect on succeeding maize crope0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“composted poultry manure, sewage sludge, and enriched urban garbage compost had higher residual effect on succeeding maize crop in groundnut-maize cropping system”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →organic · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.