Claim · model-written summary
N content of red tomato fruit was greater with the hand mix of fertilizer than with no fertilizer, ammonium sulfate or Mg oxide.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- Mountain Fresh Pluse0
- Organ / stage
- red fruite1
- Treatment
- the hand mix of fertilizere1
- Outcome
- N contente1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Comparator
- no fertilizer or with ammonium sulfate or Mg oxidee1
Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Mountain Fresh Plus’)”
e1“N content was greater in red fruit with the hand mix of fertilizer than with no fertilizer or with ammonium sulfate or Mg oxide”
Title
Janet C. Cole; Michael W. Smith; Chad J. Penn; et al. Scientia Horticulturae 2016. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.028
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect MAP and CRF gave similar plant growth and fruit production in field-grown tomato.
- Intervention effect Tomato culls were greater with either fertilizer than on control plants.
- Intervention effect Foliar N, P, Ca and Mg concentration of tomato did not differ regardless of fertilizer treatment.
- Intervention effect Tomato plants fertilized with CRF had a greater leaf K concentration than plants fertilized with MAP.
- Intervention effect Foliar K concentration of tomato did not differ between fertilized and nonfertilized plants.
- Association Zn concentration in above-ground vegetative parts of tomato increased linearly as CRF increased.
- Intervention effect Magnesium ammonium phosphate gave greater above-ground biomass (excluding fruit stem weight) and fruit yield of tomato than any individual nutrient treatment.
- Intervention effect The hand mixture of fertilizer gave greater above-ground biomass (excluding fruit stem weight) and fruit yield of tomato than any individual nutrient treatment.
- Intervention effect Calcium sulfate gave a greater number and weight of tomatoes harvested than MAP.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen concentration in roots, stems and leaves of tomato did not differ among fertilizer treatments.
- Intervention effect In immature green tomato fruit, N content was greater with no fertilizer or Ca sulfate than with MAP or TSP.
- Intervention effect Phosphorus, K and Ca concentrations of tomato did not differ among fertilizer treatments in any tissue tested.
- Intervention effect Mg concentration of green tomatoes was greater with TSP than with ammonium sulfate or Mg oxide.
- Intervention effect Phosphorus and K content of green tomato fruit was highest with Ca sulfate and lowest with MAP or TSP.
- Intervention effect Iron and Mn concentrations of tomato did not differ among fertilizer treatments in any tissue tested.
- Intervention effect Zinc concentration in tomato leaves was greater with MAP, TSP, Ca sulfate or Mg oxide than with ammonium sulfate.
- Intervention effect Zinc concentration of green tomato fruit was greater with MAP than with the hand mix, Ca sulfate or Mg oxide.
- Intervention effect Iron content of tomato green fruit was highest with TSP and lowest with ammonium sulfate or control plants.
- Intervention effect Red fruit of tomato plants fertilized with the hand mix had greater Mn content than red fruit from any other treatment.