Claim · model-written summary
Area-based photosynthetic rates of leaves remaining after defoliation were not affected by dispersed or concentrated damage.
- Taxon
- Solidago altissima
Solidago altissimae0 - Organ / stage
- leaves remaining after defoliatione1
- Treatment
- dispersed or concentrated damagee1
- Outcome
- photosynthetic ratese1
- Direction
- not affectede1
- Comparator
- undefoliated controlse2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf area was removed from Solidago altissima”
e1“Area‐based photosynthetic rates of leaves remaining after defoliation were not affected by either dispersed or concentrated damage”
e2“relative to undefoliated controls”
Title
Pattern of defoliation and its effect on photosynthesis and growth of Goldenrod
G. A. Meyer Functional Ecology 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00193.x
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Damage of both types enhanced area-based photosynthesis of regrowth leaves at 16 days after defoliation.
- Intervention effect Damage of both types enhanced area-based photosynthesis of regrowth leaves at 26 days after defoliation, to a lesser extent than at 16 days.
- Intervention effect Dispersed damage, but not concentrated damage, stimulated photosynthesis of undamaged leaves remaining after defoliation.
- Intervention effect Undamaged leaves remaining after defoliation and regrowth leaves had higher specific leaf area than comparable leaves on control plants.
- Mechanism Defoliation elevated mass-based photosynthesis more strongly than area-based photosynthesis, because of the increase in specific leaf area.
- Intervention effect Plants with dispersed damage had higher relative growth rates in the first week after defoliation than plants with concentrated damage.
- Association Plants with dispersed damage recovered more quickly from defoliation.
- Intervention effect Both types of defoliation caused similar reductions in flower production.
- Intervention effect Dispersed damage is generally less detrimental to plants than concentrated damage.