Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined spray gave the highest yield versus untreated vines.

A claim from Influence of spraying magnesium, silicon and salicylic acid on improving growth, yield and fruit properties of grapevine · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined spray gave the highest yield versus untreated vines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
the three materials (MgS+SA+KSi)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
untreated vinese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying grapevines especially with the treatment included the three materials (MgS+SA+KSi) for three times (at full bloom, two weeks after setting and 45 days after setting) recorded the highest values of vegetative parameters, yield and fruit physical and chemical properties, also the same treatment recorded the highest leaf and berry content of N, P, Ca and chlorophyll and carotenoids comparing with the untreated vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–831

Title

Influence of spraying magnesium, silicon and salicylic acid on improving growth, yield and fruit properties of grapevine

Mohamed maher Saleh; Ramadan Eisa; Mohamed Merwad; et al. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry 2022. doi:10.21608/ejchem.2022.137785.6067

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8a97e367dc91f4fdc936f8c092cee26f23e23e732940a2f3caf292147c17c7e0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

salicylic acid · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.