Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two brush-weeder passes followed by hilling produced the highest sorghum yields in the wetter-July year.

A claim from Evaluation of yielding of sorghum growing in organic farming depending on cultivation method and doses of organic fertilization. · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two brush-weeder passes followed by hilling produced the highest sorghum yields in the wetter-July year.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
brush weeder (two times during the season) and hillere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
more amount of rainfall in July and significantly less in August (2011)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in the year with more amount of rainfall in July and significantly less in August (2011), the highest yields had been noted on the objects, where brush weeder (three times during the vegetation season) and brush weeder (two times during the season) and hiller on plants (with their 30 cm height) were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–1045
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33

Title

Evaluation of yielding of sorghum growing in organic farming depending on cultivation method and doses of organic fertilization.

J. Księżak; Mariola Staniak; Jolanta Bojarszczuk Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8c6aec0bf323c4ea0d5e3db5ca736c3c7a486b2f413f7373b282d27750656e93 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

climate site · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

28 papers: 16 positive, 12 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.