Intervention effectmodel-written summary

B. bassiana inoculation preserved maize nitrogen content at its ambient CO2 baseline under elevated CO2.

A claim from Tripartite interactions of an endophytic entomopathogenic fungus, Asian corn borer, and host maize under elevated carbon dioxide · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana inoculation preserved maize nitrogen content at its ambient CO2 baseline under elevated CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Inoculation with B. bassianae0
Interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
preservinge0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 conditions without B. bassianae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with B. bassiana effectively counteracted the adverse impact of elevated CO 2 on maize plants by preserving the nitrogen content at its baseline level (comparable with ambient CO 2 conditions without B. bassiana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1337

Title

Tripartite interactions of an endophytic entomopathogenic fungus, Asian corn borer, and host maize under elevated carbon dioxide

Li Sui; Hui Zhu; Deli Wang; et al. Pest Management Science 2024. doi:10.1002/ps.8163

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-8cfbc2d01315e90fe8c52e2ebd951c6a3b831b29a0f0cc8c8cfb9e572b34827f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The presence of microorganisms during preculture and uptake experiments had no significant effect on 59Fe uptake and translocation in Alice and ys1.

    Iron Inefficiency in Maize Mutant ys1 (Zea mays L. cv Yellow-Stripe) Is Caused by a Defect in Uptake of Iron Phytosiderophores · 1994

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Azospirillum inoculation had no consistent benefit for plant nitrogen content.

    Nitrogen Fixation by Corn‐Azospirillum Associations in a Temperate Climate1 · 1981

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    On low organic carbon soils, MCP inoculation did not alter maize nutrient acquisition.

    Maize Inoculation with Microbial Consortia: Contrasting Effects on Rhizosphere Activities, Nutrient Acquisition and Early Growth in Different Soils · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Standard treatment without bacterial inoculation resulted in very low P uptake in the plants.

    Improvement of wheat and cotton growth and nutrient uptake by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. · 2004

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Cu concentrations in inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings did not differ significantly.

    Copper-Resistant Bacteria Enhance Plant Growth and Copper Phytoextraction · 2012 · compared with non-inoculated seedlings

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Pig slurry biofertilizer had no detectable effect on nutrient concentrations in corn leaves and kernels.

    Soil chemical properties and maize yield under application of pig slurry biofertilizer · 2015

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Azospirillum seed inoculation did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content.

    Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and N fertilization of corn in the Cerrado biome · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    The 360 mL biofertilizer dose produced lower accumulation of some nutrients than larger doses.

    Growth and nutritional status of maize plants in response to different doses and application frequencies of biofertilizer · 2019 · compared with larger doses

    Opposite direction

297 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.