Paper · 2016 · Revista CERES

Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and N fertilization of corn in the Cerrado biome

Ana Carolina Pereira de Vasconcelos; Thiago Prudente Siqueira; Regina Maria Quintão Lana; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a great interest to reduce doses and increase efficiency of inputs in agriculture. One alternative to lower doses of N fertilizers in corn is seed inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria, which can fix atmospheric N in soil. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of N doses-in the absence and presence of Azospirillum brasilense-on plant nutritional status at different growth stages and on seed yield of corn. The experiment was conducted during the 2011/2012 production season on a typical cerrado soil in Uberlândia, Triângulo Mineiro. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six repetitions. The treatments consisted of five N doses and the absence or presence of Azospirillum brasilense (100 mL ha-1) as a seed inoculant. A commercial product with minimum concentration of 2x108 CFU mL-1 100 mL ha-1 was used. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content and yield, except for foliar calcium and potassium at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stage. Corn yield increased with N doses up to 150 kg N ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum seed inoculation did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content.

Treatment
Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbionte1
Outcome
corn macronutrient contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content and yield, except for foliar calcium and potassium at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“diazotrophic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum seed inoculation did not significantly affect yield.

Treatment
Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbionte1
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content and yield, except for foliar calcium and potassium at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“diazotrophic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation exception involved foliar calcium at the V8 stage under 200 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbionte1
Outcome
foliar calciume0
Qualifier
at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content and yield, except for foliar calcium and potassium at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“diazotrophic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation exception involved potassium at the V8 stage under 200 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbionte1
Outcome
potassiume0
Qualifier
at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content and yield, except for foliar calcium and potassium at 200 kg N ha-1 at the V8 stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“diazotrophic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield increased with nitrogen doses up to 150 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
N doses up to 150 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yield increased with N doses up to 150 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1081 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

53 papers: 42 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 288 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 479 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.