Intervention effectmodel-written summary

M1R1 deep tillage favored maize vegetative growth relative to shallow tillage.

A claim from ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF DEEP AND SHALLOW TILLAGE PRACTICES UNDER MAIZE FALLOW ROTATION · 2007

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M1R1 deep tillage favored maize vegetative growth relative to shallow tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deep tillage treatments M1R1e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
favorablee0
Comparator
shall ow tillage treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage treatments M1R1 appeared to have provided favorable soil environment for vegetative growth and yield of maize crop as compared to shall ow tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1244

Title

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF DEEP AND SHALLOW TILLAGE PRACTICES UNDER MAIZE FALLOW ROTATION

Mansoor Khan Khattak; Abdul Qadir Mughal; Liaqat Ali Jamal; et al. 2007

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8d8e44e39fcdf79e2a0aae23fdb6fd726d1960ff323fa711b29e341ce103cf34 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this claim · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Conventional tillage and no-till plots had lower maize shoot dry matter than hand-planted no-till plots, but higher than severe disturbance.

    Effect of degree of soil disturbance on mycorrhizal colonization and phosphorus absorption by maize in growth chamber and field experiments · 1990 · compared with hand‐planted no‐till plots

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    No-till reduced 4-week height of continuous corn by 17% compared with plowing.

    Effect of Tillage and Rotation on Agronomic Performance of Corn and Soybean: Twenty‐Year Study on Dark Silty Clay Loam Soil · 1996 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Early-season no-till maize had reduced dry matter compared with conventional tillage, due to cooler temperatures near the seed.

    Mycorrhizae, Phosphorus Absorption, and Yield of Maize in Response to Tillage · 1996 · compared with conventional tillage

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    The 12.5 Mg compaction reduced mature corn height by 26% in 1983.

    Temporal Effects of Subsoil Compaction on Soil Strength and Plant Growth · 1991 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    No-till depressed initial corn emergence relative to conventional plowing; emergence ranked CN > TP = CH > NT.

    Seed Zone Soil Temperature and Early Corn Growth with Three Conservation Tillage Systems · 1987 · compared with CN

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Tillage and interactions generally did not affect soil properties, corn growth, or N uptake.

    Residual Effects of No‐Till Crop Residues on Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1993

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Overall root length density of maize did not differ significantly between conventional tillage and no-tillage on the sandy loam soil.

    Impact of Tillage and Banded Starter Fertilizer on Maize Root Growth in the Top 25 Centimeters of the Soil · 2005 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    No-till had a lower kernel growth rate than conventional and ridge tillage in 1988.

    Tillage Effects on Some Soil Physical and Corn Physiological Characteristics · 1990 · compared with CT and RT

    Opposite direction

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.