Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping increased maize biomass relative to monocropping.

A claim from Intercropping of tobacco and maize at seedling stage promotes crop growth through manipulating rhizosphere microenvironment · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased maize biomass relative to monocropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mono-croppinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with mono-cropping, intercropping increased the biomass of the two crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–772
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34

Title

Intercropping of tobacco and maize at seedling stage promotes crop growth through manipulating rhizosphere microenvironment

Junmei Ma; Di Liu; Peiyan Zhao; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1470229

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8dfd05f81ab6f77fabc7ae405c91f79f172735711f06de9139a7194e52f3481a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

intercropping · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

184 papers: 138 positive, 46 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

175 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.