Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping increased maize biomass relative to monocropping.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Compared with mono-cropping, intercropping increased the biomass of the two crops”
t0“tobacco and maize”
Title
Junmei Ma; Di Liu; Peiyan Zhao; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1470229
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Intercropping increased tobacco biomass relative to monocropping.
- Observation Intercropping promoted nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium absorption in the two crops.
- Observation Intercropped tobacco soil had significantly increased sucrase, catalase and nitrate reductase activity and available potassium.
- Observation Intercropped maize soil had significantly increased available potassium, nitrate reductase and acid phosphatase.
- Observation Rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities responded differently to planting patterns.
- Observation Environmental factors regulated dominant soil microbial communities.
- Observation Intercropping made soil microbial networks more complex.
- Observation Intercropping enhanced reciprocal relationships between bacteria and fungi.
- Observation Intercropping and monocropping soil metabolites differed mainly in three carbohydrate metabolism pathways.
- Observation Carbohydrate metabolite content was significantly higher in intercropping soil.
- Observation D-Sucrose, D-Fructose-6-Phosphate and D-Glucose-1-Phosphatel significantly influenced dominant microbial composition.