Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Intercropping of tobacco and maize at seedling stage promotes crop growth through manipulating rhizosphere microenvironment

Junmei Ma; Di Liu; Peiyan Zhao; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Changes in the rhizosphere microbiome and metabolites resulting from crop intercropping can significantly enhance crop growth. While there has been an increasing number of studies on various crop combinations, research on the intercropping of tobacco and maize at seedling stage remains limited. Methods: This study is the first to explore rhizosphere effects of intercropping between tobacco and maize seedling stages, we analyzed the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrients in the soil, and revealed the important effects on soil microbial community composition and metabolite profiles, thereby regulating crop growth and improving soil balance. Results and discussion: Compared with mono-cropping, intercropping increased the biomass of the two crops and promoted the nutrient absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Under intercropping conditions, the activities of sucrase, catalase and nitrate reductase in tobacco rhizosphere soil and the content of available potassium, the activities of nitrate reductase and acid phosphatase in maize rhizosphere soil were significantly increasing. Rhizosphere soil bacterial and fungal communities such as Sphingomonas, Massilia, Humicola and Penicillium respond differently to crop planting patterns, and soil dominant microbial communities are regulated by environmental factors such as pH, Organic Matter, Available Potassium, Nitrate Reductase, and Urease Enzyme. Network analysis showed that soil microbial communities were more complex after intercropping, and the reciprocal relationship between bacteria and fungi was enhanced. The difference of metabolites in soil between intercropping and monocropping system was mainly concentrated in galactose metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism pathway, and the content of carbohydrate metabolites was significantly higher than that of monocropping soil. Key metabolites such as D-Sucrose, D-Fructose-6-Phosphate, D-Glucose-1-Phosphatel significantly influence the composition of dominant microbial communities such as Sphingomonas and Penicillium. This study explained the effects of intercropping between flue-cured tobacco and maize on the content of soil metabolites and soil microbial composition in rhizosphere soil, and deepened the understanding that intercropping system can improve the growth of flue-cured crops seedlings through rhizosphere effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased tobacco biomass relative to monocropping.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mono-croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with mono-cropping, intercropping increased the biomass of the two crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased maize biomass relative to monocropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mono-croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with mono-cropping, intercropping increased the biomass of the two crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping promoted nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium absorption in the two crops.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
nutrient absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping increased the biomass of the two crops and promoted the nutrient absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped tobacco soil had significantly increased sucrase, catalase and nitrate reductase activity and available potassium.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
activities of sucrase, catalase and nitrate reductasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under intercropping conditions, the activities of sucrase, catalase and nitrate reductase in tobacco rhizosphere soil and the content of available potassium, the activities of nitrate reductase and acid phosphatase in maize rhizosphere soil were significantly increasing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped maize soil had significantly increased available potassium, nitrate reductase and acid phosphatase.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
activities of nitrate reductase and acid phosphatasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of available potassium, the activities of nitrate reductase and acid phosphatase in maize rhizosphere soil were significantly increasing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities responded differently to planting patterns.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Outcome
Rhizosphere soil bacterial and fungal communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizosphere soil bacterial and fungal communities such as Sphingomonas, Massilia, Humicola and Penicillium respond differently to crop planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental factors regulated dominant soil microbial communities.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Outcome
soil dominant microbial communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil dominant microbial communities are regulated by environmental factors such as pH, Organic Matter, Available Potassium, Nitrate Reductase, and Urease Enzyme.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping made soil microbial networks more complex.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
soil microbial communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil microbial communities were more complex after intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping enhanced reciprocal relationships between bacteria and fungi.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Outcome
reciprocal relationship between bacteria and fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reciprocal relationship between bacteria and fungi was enhanced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping and monocropping soil metabolites differed mainly in three carbohydrate metabolism pathways.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Outcome
difference of metabolites in soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference of metabolites in soil between intercropping and monocropping system was mainly concentrated in galactose metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1779 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate metabolite content was significantly higher in intercropping soil.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Outcome
content of carbohydrate metabolitese0
Comparator
monocropping soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of carbohydrate metabolites was significantly higher than that of monocropping soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1881 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

D-Sucrose, D-Fructose-6-Phosphate and D-Glucose-1-Phosphatel significantly influenced dominant microbial composition.

Taxon
tobacco and maizeNicotiana tabacumZea mayst0
Compound
D-Sucrose, D-Fructose-6-Phosphate, D-Glucose-1-Phosphatele0
Outcome
composition of dominant microbial communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Key metabolites such as D-Sucrose, D-Fructose-6-Phosphate, D-Glucose-1-Phosphatel significantly influence the composition of dominant microbial communities such as Sphingomonas and Penicillium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2075 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–34 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

184 papers: 138 positive, 46 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

intercropping · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.