Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation produced higher total root-exudate sugars and amino acids than Corynebacterium inoculation.

A claim from Effect of Inoculation on Root Exudates Carbon Sugar and Amino Acids Production of Different Rice Varieties · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation produced higher total root-exudate sugars and amino acids than Corynebacterium inoculation.

Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobium sp.e0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
Corynebacterium sp.Corynebacteriume0symbiont
Outcome
total sugars and amino acids in root exudatese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Corynebacterium sp.e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Corynebacterium
Corynebacterium · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice genotypes inoculated with Rhizobium sp. produced higher amount of total sugars and amino acids in root exudates compared to that of Corynebacterium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1448

Title

Effect of Inoculation on Root Exudates Carbon Sugar and Amino Acids Production of Different Rice Varieties

U.A. Naher; O. Radziah; M.S. Halimi; et al. Research Journal of Microbiology 2008. doi:10.3923/jm.2008.580.587

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8e0a32954b493f77c54e33fca98ead8f954850930febc8c25d5452fe83f550e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.