Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In cucumber bioassays, the best composts supported plant heights of 190-205 cm by Week 8, outperforming lower-nutrient formulations.

A claim from Optimization of organic fertilizer production using the co-composting process of cow manure and chicken manure with the addition of plant organic waste · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cucumber bioassays, the best composts supported plant heights of 190-205 cm by Week 8, outperforming lower-nutrient formulations.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
the best compostse0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
outperforminge0
Value
190– 205 cme0
Comparator
lower-nutrient formulationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber bioassays demonstrated strong fertiliser efficacy, with the best composts supporting plant heights of 190– 205 cm and more than 30 leaves by Week 8, outperforming lower-nutrient formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–917

Title

Optimization of organic fertilizer production using the co-composting process of cow manure and chicken manure with the addition of plant organic waste

Eli Hendrik Sanjaya; Yudhi Utomo; Agung Witjoro; et al. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) 2026. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202669502002/pdf

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-8ebf7bce02db0b6a3d3cb41686541e7a0bf44a940f53093665358a8ee8150caf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Successive silicate fertilizer application adversely affected cucumber growth.

    Effect of silicon on the growth of cucumber plant in soil culture · 1983

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Disease development increased in cucumber grown in non-silicate fertilizer culture.

    Reduction of Resistance to Corynespora Target Leaf Spot in Cucumber Grafted on a Bloomless Rootstock. · 1993

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Increasing potassium nitrate did not change seedling growth.

    High-Nitrate-Supply-Induced Transcriptional Upregulation of Ascorbic Acid Biosynthetic and Recycling Pathways in Cucumber · 2023

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Nitrogen and mycelium amended willow substrate did not promote transplant growth.

    Compost from willow biomass (Salix viminalis L.) as a horticultural substrate alternative to peat in the production of vegetable transplants · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Cucumber growth inhibition was strongest at 10% fertilizer over 72 hours, especially with high salinity or low pH.

    Acute toxicity of experimental fertilizers made of blood meal, spent coffee ground and biomass ash · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Stem diameter under solutions 3 and 2 did not differ significantly from solution 1.

    The effect of different nutrient solutions on some growth indices of greenhouse cucumber in soilless culture · 2011 · compared with No 1 nutrient solution

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    The high fertilization level F3 had a negative effect on cucumber plant growth under the low moisture level W3.

    Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield and water use efficiency in greenhouse potted cucumber · 2010

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    33% fly ash compost significantly reduced cucumber biomass by 55%.

    Extractability, Plant Yield and Toxicity Thresholds for Boron in Compost · 2008

    Opposite direction

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.