Claim · model-written summary
Spraying clusters without prebloom shoot inhibition had no inhibitory effect on shoot growth during bloom and set.
- Taxon
- Grapest0
- Organ / stage
- shoote2
- Treatment
- spraying on clustere2
- Outcome
- shoot growthe2
- Direction
- no inhibitory effecte2
- Qualifier
- during bloom and set stagese2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
t0“Promotion of Berry Set in Grapes by Growth Retardants”
e2“The spraying on cluster had no inhibitory effect on shoot growth during bloom and set stages”
Title
Promotion of Berry Set in Grapes by Growth Retardants
Ryuji NAITO; Takaaki HAYASHI Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1976. doi:10.2503/jjshs.45.135
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Prebloom SADH spray on Kyoho clusters increased the set of seeded berries, as effectively as foliar treatment or shoot pinching.
- Intervention effect CCC applied at 200 ppm to Muscat of Alexandria clusters gave nearly the same increase in berry set as seen with SADH.
- Intervention effect Growth retardant applications to clusters or leaves distinctly reduced gibberellin activity in florets at the beginning of bloom.
- Intervention effect Shoot pinching raised gibberellin activity in florets of Muscat of Alexandria.
- Intervention effect Shoot pinching did not affect gibberellin activity in florets of Kyoho.
- Intervention effect Retardant applications markedly enhanced cytokinin activity in florets in both cultivars.
- Intervention effect Shoot pinching markedly enhanced cytokinin activity in florets in both cultivars.
- Mechanism Reduction of shoot growth is not essential for growth retardants to promote the set of seeded berries.
- Mechanism Increased cytokinin activity in florets induced by the chemicals is causally associated with the promoted berry set.