Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pruning and N fertilization had little effect on apple yield.

A claim from Effects of Fruiting, Pruning, and Nitrogen Fertilization on Shoot Growth of ‘Empire’ Apple Trees1 · 1982

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning and N fertilization had little effect on apple yield.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruning and Ne0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The thinning treatments resulted in significant differences in yield, but pruning and N had little effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–558
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96

Title

Effects of Fruiting, Pruning, and Nitrogen Fertilization on Shoot Growth of ‘Empire’ Apple Trees1

C. G. Forshey Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1982. doi:10.21273/jashs.107.6.1092

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-9059eef40d5b4a2094b4ab3f545825ae0e5240719121a3751100eec859e3db09 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.