Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PGPR preparations increased chickpea total yield and seed protein versus untreated seed in field trials.

A claim from EFFICACY OF SECONDARY METABOLITES AND EXTRACELLULAR LYTIC ENZYMES OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA (PGPR) IN CONTROLLING FUSARIUM WILT OF CHICKPEA · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR preparations increased chickpea total yield and seed protein versus untreated seed in field trials.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
cell cultures, cultures filtrates and metabolic precipitates of both PGPR strainse0
Outcome
total yield / feddan and protein content in seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated seeds (control)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using cell cultures, cultures filtrates and metabolic precipitates of both PGPR strains significantly increased growth parameters (plant height and number of branches per plant), yield components (numbers of pod and seed /plant, weight of 100 seed, total yield / feddan and protein content in seeds) compared with untreated seeds (control) during growing seasons 2013-14 and 2014-15 under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–2121
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–153

Title

EFFICACY OF SECONDARY METABOLITES AND EXTRACELLULAR LYTIC ENZYMES OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA (PGPR) IN CONTROLLING FUSARIUM WILT OF CHICKPEA

MONTASER F. ABDEL-MONAIM Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2016. doi:10.21608/ejar.2016.152587

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-90b5b8b710d646490e1ec6fa89143fe7c216b252362ce1167de6970db951f78f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.