Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CCC stimulated tillering in wheat, contributing less to the yield increase than the grains per ear.

A claim from The influence of (2-chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride (CCC) and gibberellic acid on wheat yields · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC stimulated tillering in wheat, contributing less to the yield increase than the grains per ear.

Treatment
CCCe1
Outcome
tilleringe2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In two field experiments in which wheat was grown under high levels of nitrogenous fertiliser CCC treated plants outyielded the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136
e2

“This increase in grain yield was mainly due to an increase in the number of grains produced per ear, with a smaller contribution from a stimulation of tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–347

Title

The influence of (2-chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride (CCC) and gibberellic acid on wheat yields

LB Lowe; OG Carter Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1970. doi:10.1071/ea9700354

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-92b446c65e1c836c7f504a32160e9d674c4cf9de63bb2c98a1a526c01facb881 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

chlormequat chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

49 papers: 37 positive, 12 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.