Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In terms of LER and total seed protein yield, the various intercrop density combinations showed no advantage, except between the lowest and the highest densities of either maize or cowpea.

A claim from Relative Sowing Time and Density of Component Crops in a Maize/Cowpea Intercrop System · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In terms of LER and total seed protein yield, the various intercrop density combinations showed no advantage, except between the lowest and the highest densities of either maize or cowpea.

Treatment
various intercrop density combinationse0
Outcome
LER and total seed protein yielde0
Direction
no advantagee0
Qualifier
except between the lowest and the highest densities of either maize or cowpeae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize/Cowpea Intercrop System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–86
e0

“In terms of LER and total seed protein yield, there was no advantage of either staggered sowings over simultaneous sowing or of the various intercrop density combinations, except between the lowest and the highest densities of either maize or cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–983

Title

Relative Sowing Time and Density of Component Crops in a Maize/Cowpea Intercrop System

Francis Ofori; W. R. Stern Experimental Agriculture 1987. doi:10.1017/s0014479700001113

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-95e41397bfecdf6ecbe39ca35512327e94b4604ad94488f666720570b3286998 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

intercropping · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

intercropping · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.