Paper · 2020 · Cleaner Engineering and Technology

Intercropping of maize with legumes: A cleaner strategy for improving the quantity and quality of forage

Abdollah Javanmard; Mostafa Amani Machiani; Anastasios Lithourgidis; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Intercropping is an eco-friendly agricultural practice for achieving higher quantity and quality of forage crops. The present study was aimed to evaluate the forage quality, quantity and ecological indices (monetary and competition) of maize in intercropping with different legumes at two different growing years (2017–2018) in the north west of Iran. The treatments were monoculture of two maize hybrids (KSC301 and KSC704), grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.), berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.), bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and additive intercropping of two maize hybrids with the above mentioned legumes. The highest and lowest total forage yield and crude protein yield (CPY) was achieved in intercropping of KSC301 with hairy vetch and maize monocultures. Also, the highest value of total digestible nutrients (TDN), dry matter digestibility (DMD), dry matter intake (DMI) and net energy for lactation (NEl) was observed in intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea. In addition, acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents in maize monocultures increased by 19% and 29% compared with intercropping patterns. Averagely, the highest RVT was calculated in the intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea and KSC301 with hairy vetch. The maximum LER was achieved in intercropping of KSC301+ hairy vetch and KSC704+ hairy vetch. Generally, based on the forage quantity, quality and monetary indices, intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea and KSC301 with hairy vetch was superior to maize monocultures and can be suggested, as an eco-friendly and cleaner production method, to farmers instead of monoculture systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSC301 with hairy vetch had the highest total forage yield and crude protein yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Treatment
intercropping of KSC301 with hairy vetche0
Outcome
total forage yield and crude protein yield (CPY)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
maize monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest total forage yield and crude protein yield (CPY) was achieved in intercropping of KSC301 with hairy vetch and maize monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSC301 with grasspea had the highest TDN, DMD and DMI.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Treatment
intercropping of KSC301 with grasspeae0
Outcome
total digestible nutrients (TDN), dry matter digestibility (DMD), dry matter intake (DMI)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of total digestible nutrients (TDN), dry matter digestibility (DMD), dry matter intake (DMI) and net energy for lactation (NEl) was observed in intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSC301 with grasspea had the highest net energy for lactation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Treatment
intercropping of KSC301 with grasspeae0
Outcome
net energy for lactation (NEl)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of total digestible nutrients (TDN), dry matter digestibility (DMD), dry matter intake (DMI) and net energy for lactation (NEl) was observed in intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize monocultures had 19% higher acid detergent fiber than intercrops.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize monoculturese0
Outcome
acid detergent fiber (ADF)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
intercropping patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents in maize monocultures increased by 19% and 29% compared with intercropping patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize monocultures had 29% higher neutral detergent fiber than intercrops.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
maize monoculturese0
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber (NDF)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
intercropping patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents in maize monocultures increased by 19% and 29% compared with intercropping patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative value total was highest for KSC301 with grasspea.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Treatment
intercropping of KSC301 with grasspeae0
Outcome
RVTe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest RVT was calculated in the intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea and KSC301 with hairy vetch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative value total was highest for KSC301 with hairy vetch.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Treatment
KSC301 with hairy vetche0
Outcome
RVTe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest RVT was calculated in the intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea and KSC301 with hairy vetch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio was maximal for KSC301 with hairy vetch.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Treatment
KSC301+ hairy vetche0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum LER was achieved in intercropping of KSC301+ hairy vetch and KSC704+ hairy vetch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio was maximal for KSC704 with hairy vetch.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC704e0
Treatment
KSC704+ hairy vetche0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum LER was achieved in intercropping of KSC301+ hairy vetch and KSC704+ hairy vetch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend KSC301 with grasspea instead of maize monoculture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Outcome
intercropping of KSC301 with grasspeae0
Comparator
maize monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea and KSC301 with hairy vetch was superior to maize monocultures and can be suggested, as an eco-friendly and cleaner production method, to farmers instead of monoculture systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend KSC301 with hairy vetch instead of maize monoculture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
KSC301e0
Outcome
KSC301 with hairy vetche0
Comparator
maize monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of KSC301 with grasspea and KSC301 with hairy vetch was superior to maize monocultures and can be suggested, as an eco-friendly and cleaner production method, to farmers instead of monoculture systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑

Vicia villosa · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 122 positive, 19 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.