Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping reduced nutrient absorption by maize.

A claim from Comparison of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium utilization efficiency in maize/mungbean intercropping · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced nutrient absorption by maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Nutrient absorptione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient absorption by both maize and mungbean was reduced due to intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–828

Title

Comparison of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium utilization efficiency in maize/mungbean intercropping

M. K. Chowdhury; E. L. Rosario The Journal of Agricultural Science 1994. doi:10.1017/s0021859600087360

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-18ee3ebee5b98f0c1e3896ddcbf774a3588b37018d3f2950939657cc2fb23948 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

intercropping · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 122 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 122 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

132 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.