Claim · model-written summary
Relative growth rate was smaller in narrow rows for either hybrid from V4 to R6.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“During the sampled period (V4 to R6) the relative growth rate was smaller when either hybrid was grown in narrow rows.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
Title
MATHEMATICAL GROWTH ANALYSES OF CORN (ZEA MAYS L.) GROWN IN NARROW AND WIDE ROWS (CGR, NAR, LAI)
D. G. Bullock Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 1985
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Narrow rows produced 723 kg grain ha('-1) more for Pioneer 3732.
- Intervention effect Narrow rows produced 538 kg grain ha('-1) more for Beck 65XS.
- Intervention effect Narrow rows had larger crop growth rate until the end of the season.
- Intervention effect Narrow rows had larger leaf area index.
- Intervention effect Net assimilation rate was unaffected by row width.
- Intervention effect Specific leaf area was smaller in narrow rows.
- Observation Narrow row crops deposited proportionally more photosynthates in stalks than leaves.
- Intervention effect Narrow row crops remobilized proportionally less vegetative dry weight during grain filling.
- Intervention effect Leaf area ratio was smaller in narrow rows for both hybrids.
- Intervention effect Canopy nitrogen concentration did not differ between row widths.
- Intervention effect Stalk nitrogen concentration did not differ between row widths.
- Association Larger dry weight yielded more total nitrogen in canopy and stalk.
- Mechanism The authors suggested increased nitrogen remobilization produced higher grain nitrogen concentration.
- Mechanism The authors suggested higher grain nitrogen concentration increased dry weight accumulation in grain.
- Intervention effect Relative nitrogen mobilization rates did not differ by row width.