Claim · model-written summary
Narrow rows had larger leaf area index.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This was due to a larger narrow row LAI.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L.)”
Title
MATHEMATICAL GROWTH ANALYSES OF CORN (ZEA MAYS L.) GROWN IN NARROW AND WIDE ROWS (CGR, NAR, LAI)
D. G. Bullock Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 1985
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Narrow rows produced 723 kg grain ha('-1) more for Pioneer 3732.
- Intervention effect Narrow rows produced 538 kg grain ha('-1) more for Beck 65XS.
- Intervention effect Narrow rows had larger crop growth rate until the end of the season.
- Intervention effect Net assimilation rate was unaffected by row width.
- Intervention effect Specific leaf area was smaller in narrow rows.
- Intervention effect Relative growth rate was smaller in narrow rows for either hybrid from V4 to R6.
- Observation Narrow row crops deposited proportionally more photosynthates in stalks than leaves.
- Intervention effect Narrow row crops remobilized proportionally less vegetative dry weight during grain filling.
- Intervention effect Leaf area ratio was smaller in narrow rows for both hybrids.
- Intervention effect Canopy nitrogen concentration did not differ between row widths.
- Intervention effect Stalk nitrogen concentration did not differ between row widths.
- Association Larger dry weight yielded more total nitrogen in canopy and stalk.
- Mechanism The authors suggested increased nitrogen remobilization produced higher grain nitrogen concentration.
- Mechanism The authors suggested higher grain nitrogen concentration increased dry weight accumulation in grain.
- Intervention effect Relative nitrogen mobilization rates did not differ by row width.