Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NT had lower WUE and grain yield than CT in 1993.

A claim from Effect of tillage and residue management on barley and canola growth and water use efficiency · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NT had lower WUE and grain yield than CT in 1993.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
lower grain yielde0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1993, NT and MNT had lower WUE, which coincided with lower grain yield as compared with CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1732
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50

Title

Effect of tillage and residue management on barley and canola growth and water use efficiency

R. H. Azooz; M. A. Arshad Canadian Journal of Soil Science 1998. doi:10.4141/s97-098

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-96808ae630456252ba50827cbaea2c5c9abd0af3e8ee7fdc6e2e5b82daad47e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.