Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No surface tillage produced 15% more whole plant biomass than conventional tillage in one of three years.

A claim from Irrigated Cotton Response to Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No surface tillage produced 15% more whole plant biomass than conventional tillage in one of three years.

Treatment
No surface tillagee3
Outcome
whole plant biomasse3
Direction
moree3
Value
15%e3
Qualifier
one of three yearse3
Comparator
conventional tillage treatmentse3
Setting
Tennessee Valleyt0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Cotton Response to Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68
e3

“No surface tillage, regardless of fall paratillage, produced 15% more whole plant biomass than conventional tillage treatments one of three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1213

Title

Irrigated Cotton Response to Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley

Kipling S. Balkcom; J. N. Shaw; D. W. Reeves; et al. 2007

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-97ee6bf201e9c2b04ff2c7cdc165385868ec77555082d9687d50ae8f62ea76e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.