Claim · model-written summary
Neither subsoiling nor nematicide affected cotton development or root topology.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- subsoiling nor nematicide applicatione0
- Outcome
- cotton development or root topologye0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither subsoiling nor nematicide application affected cotton development or root topology”
Title
Jianbing Ma Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 2012
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Bulk density generally did not affect cotton seedling growth or disease under well-watered conditions.
- Intervention effect Combined M. incognita and T. basicola reduced cotton seedling stands more than either pathogen alone.
- Intervention effect Combined pathogens reduced cotton root volume more than either alone.
- Intervention effect M. incognita reduced cotton root topological characters.
- Intervention effect T. basicola reduced cotton root topological characters.
- Intervention effect Only M. incognita changed cotton root topological index.
- Intervention effect Subsoiling did not consistently affect early season cotton growth.
- Intervention effect Nematicide improved cotton seedling growth in 2010 and 2011.
- Intervention effect Telone II suppressed cotton root galling.
- Intervention effect Telone II suppressed M. incognita population in cotton.
- Intervention effect A soil hard pan generally improved cotton seedling growth.
- Intervention effect M. incognita reduced cotton taproot length.
- Intervention effect M. incognita delayed cotton maturity.
- Intervention effect M. incognita reduced seed cotton yield.
- Method / resource Root topology offers a way to quantify changes from soilborne pathogens and soil physical factors.