Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SRI 3 gave more grains per panicle.

A claim from Evaluation of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for Enhanced Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Production in the Guinea Savannah Zone of Ghana · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI 3 gave more grains per panicle.

Treatment
SRI 3e0
Outcome
number of grains per paniclee0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher number of grains per panicle was obtained in SRI 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1238
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–86

Title

Evaluation of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for Enhanced Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Production in the Guinea Savannah Zone of Ghana

I. K Dzomeku; E.N.K Sowley; I. S Yussif Current Agriculture Research Journal 2016. doi:10.12944/carj.4.1.09

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-97f3fb03141bbd64f91d3c7c9bf02311d2ef41730bbe9aa34d610eac68302991 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    SRI produced significantly higher grain yield than conventional management under transplanting and mechanical transplanting.

    【Short Report】Influence of the Improved System of Rice Intensification (SRI) on Rice Yield, Yield Components and Tillering Characteristics under Different Rice Establishment Methods · 2013 · compared with CM

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Overall alternate wetting and drying decreased rice yields by 5.4%.

    Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Rondo grain yield declined in the order continuous flooding, saturated, aerobic.

    Soil Texture and Cultivar Effects on Rice (Oryza sativa, L.) Grain Yield, Yield Components and Water Productivity in Three Water Regimes · 2016

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    The authors found fertilizer and irrigation investment had limited effects on rice production.

    Moving toward rice self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030: Lessons learned from 10 years of the Coalition for African Rice Development · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    AWD caused no significant rice yield loss versus CF.

    Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from irrigated rice cultivation through improved fertilizer and water management · 2022 · compared with CF condition

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Irrigation treatments increased spikelet sterility by 16.6%.

    Role of Panicle Exsertion in Water Stress Induced Sterility1 · 1983

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    DI reduced rice grain yield by 31.76-52.19% against CF.

    Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation · 2013 · compared with CF treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Irrigation treatment did not affect harvest timing.

    Sprinkler vs. Flood Irrigation in Traditional Rice Production Regions of Southeast Texas · 1990

    Opposite direction

1,162 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.