Abstract
The impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional management (CM) on grain yield, yield components and tillering capacity were examined under 4 rice establishment methods transplanting (TP), seedling casting (SC), mechanical transplanting (MT) and direct seeding (DS). SRI produced significantly higher grain yield than CM under TP and MT but not under DS or SC. DS and SC produced much higher seedling quality than TP or MT, suggesting that robust seedlings with vigorous roots weaken the positive effect of SRI on rice yield. SRI produced a higher tillering rate than CM, but did not affect ear-bearing tiller rate significantly. Moreover, the net photosynthetic rate of the recent fully expanded leaf at mid-tillering stage was significantly higher in SRI than in CM under MT and TP. The obtained results also indicated that SRI increased biomass accumulation before heading and improved utilization of photosynthates in the grain-filling stage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
SRI produced significantly higher grain yield than conventional management under transplanting and mechanical transplanting.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- under TP and MTe1
- Comparator
- CMe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“SRI produced significantly higher grain yield than CM under TP and MT”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI did not produce higher grain yield than conventional management under direct seeding or seedling casting.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Qualifier
- under DS or SCe1
- Comparator
- CMe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“SRI produced significantly higher grain yield than CM under TP and MT but not under DS or SC”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct seeding and seedling casting produced much higher seedling quality than transplanting or mechanical transplanting.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- DS and SCe1
- Outcome
- seedling qualitye1
- Direction
- much highere1
- Comparator
- TP or MTe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“DS and SC produced much higher seedling quality than TP or MT”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that robust seedlings with vigorous roots weaken the positive effect of SRI on rice yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- positive effect of SRI on rice yielde1
- Qualifier
- robust seedlings with vigorous roots weakene1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“suggesting that robust seedlings with vigorous roots weaken the positive effect of SRI on rice yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI produced a higher tillering rate than conventional management.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“SRI produced a higher tillering rate than CM”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI did not significantly affect the ear-bearing tiller rate relative to conventional management.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- ear-bearing tiller ratee1
- Direction
- did not affecte1
- Comparator
- CMe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“SRI produced a higher tillering rate than CM, but did not affect ear-bearing tiller rate significantly”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthetic rate of the recent fully expanded leaf at mid-tillering was significantly higher in SRI than in conventional management under mechanical transplanting and transplanting.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- recent fully expanded leaf at mid-tillering stagee1
- Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- net photosynthetic ratee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- under MT and TPe1
- Comparator
- CMe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the net photosynthetic rate of the recent fully expanded leaf at mid-tillering stage was significantly higher in SRI than in CM under MT and TP”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI increased biomass accumulation before heading.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- biomass accumulation before headinge1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“SRI increased biomass accumulation before heading and improved utilization of photosynthates in the grain-filling stage”
t0“on Rice Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI improved utilization of photosynthates in the grain-filling stage.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Organ / stage
- grain-filling stagee1
- Treatment
- SRIe1
- Outcome
- utilization of photosynthatese1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“SRI increased biomass accumulation before heading and improved utilization of photosynthates in the grain-filling stage”
t0“on Rice Yield”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.