Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation and zeolite in cattle manure interacted significantly for plant height, peduncle length, grains per spike, thousand grain weight, and grain yield.

A claim from Effect of Zeolite amended cattle manure compost and Mycorrhiza fungi inoculation on growth and yield of triticale (x Tritico-secale wittmack). · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation and zeolite in cattle manure interacted significantly for plant height, peduncle length, grains per spike, thousand grain weight, and grain yield.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
plant height, peduncle length, number of grains per spike, 1000 grain weight and grain yielde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the results, the interaction between mycorrhizal inoculation and mixing of zeolite with cattle manure were significant on plant height, peduncle length, number of grains per spike, 1000 grain weight and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2368–2592
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113

Title

Effect of Zeolite amended cattle manure compost and Mycorrhiza fungi inoculation on growth and yield of triticale (x Tritico-secale wittmack).

Manoochehr Makvandi; A. Bakhshandeh; Aydin Khodaei Joghan; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2020. doi:10.22067/gsc.v18i1.81266

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9837b97b42e5b9c80bb4fb16551dc0d8cb7795ea03949783cd03f89db27bdb2b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.