Claim · model-written summary
Adding inoculants tended to decrease acetic acid content of sorghum silage.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume1
- Treatment
- Addition of inoculantse7
- Outcome
- acetic acide2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Comparator
- Silage with no additivese4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e1“Whole plants fo forage sorghum cultivar FS5 was harvested at soft dough stage of maturity”
e4“Silage with no additives served as a control”
e7“Addition of inoculants did not influence (P0.05) the ash and crude protein contents”
e2“tended to decrease acetic acid (P0.05), butyric acid (P0.01) and propionic acid (P0.01) contents”
Title
Guan Wu Zhongguo nongye Kexue 2002
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Both inoculants caused a more rapid decline in silage pH than untreated silage.
- Intervention effect Both inoculants produced a higher amount of lactic acid in silage than untreated silage.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with any inoculant produced a little more CO 2 than control silage.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with any inoculant had more glucose loss than control silage.
- Intervention effect Adding inoculants did not influence the ash and crude protein contents of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Adding inoculants tended to decrease butyric acid content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Adding inoculants tended to decrease propionic acid content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with inoculant B had the most dry matter of the silages.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with inoculant B had the most lactic acid of the silages.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with inoculant B had the least acetic acid content of the silages.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B reduced ADF content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B reduced ADL and NDF contents of sorghum silage.