Claim · model-written summary
Adding inoculants did not influence the ash and crude protein contents of sorghum silage.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume1
- Treatment
- Addition of inoculantse7
- Outcome
- ash and crude protein contentse7
- Direction
- did not influencee7
- Comparator
- Silage with no additivese4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e1“Whole plants fo forage sorghum cultivar FS5 was harvested at soft dough stage of maturity”
e4“Silage with no additives served as a control”
e7“Addition of inoculants did not influence (P0.05) the ash and crude protein contents”
Title
Guan Wu Zhongguo nongye Kexue 2002
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Both inoculants caused a more rapid decline in silage pH than untreated silage.
- Intervention effect Both inoculants produced a higher amount of lactic acid in silage than untreated silage.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with any inoculant produced a little more CO 2 than control silage.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with any inoculant had more glucose loss than control silage.
- Intervention effect Adding inoculants tended to decrease acetic acid content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Adding inoculants tended to decrease butyric acid content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Adding inoculants tended to decrease propionic acid content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with inoculant B had the most dry matter of the silages.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with inoculant B had the most lactic acid of the silages.
- Intervention effect Silage treated with inoculant B had the least acetic acid content of the silages.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B reduced ADF content of sorghum silage.
- Intervention effect Inoculant B reduced ADL and NDF contents of sorghum silage.