Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitroxin and AMF co-inoculation raised sorghum protein yield by 19.63% under severe drought.

A claim from Nitroxin and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate negative effects of drought stress on Sorghum bicolor yield through improving physiological and biochemical characteristics · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitroxin and AMF co-inoculation raised sorghum protein yield by 19.63% under severe drought.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
co-inoculation with Nitroxin and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
Nitroxine0symbiont
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.63%e0
Comparator
non-application of these bio-fertilizerse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation with Nitroxin and AMF under severe drought stress conditions increased grain yield and protein yield of sorghum by 27 and 19.63%, respectively, compared to non-application of these bio-fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1768

Title

Nitroxin and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate negative effects of drought stress on Sorghum bicolor yield through improving physiological and biochemical characteristics

Shirzad Kamali; Ahmad Mehraban Plant Signaling & Behavior 2020. doi:10.1080/15592324.2020.1813998

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-b114edcd2e293bf4842c6f2adabced57e06e1d1a29c640872efc44680fa71c0f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

inoculation · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.