Paper · 2025 · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)

Forage Production and Nutritional Quality of

Anton Kuswoyo; Luki Abdullah; Panca Dewi Manu Hara Karti; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Forage is a critical component in ruminant nutrition, yet the availability of land for cultivating quality forage is increasingly limited. Post-coal mining lands offer a promising alternative for forage production, despite their poor soil fertility and degraded structure. This study aimed to evaluate the forage production and nutritional quality of Sorghum bicolor cv. Samurai-1 in response to different urea fertilization rates and the application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on post-coal mining land in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. A Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with a two-factorial arrangement and four replications was employed. Factor A consisted of urea rates (200, 300, and 400 kg/ha), while Factor B involved AMF application (with and without). Results indicated that both urea and AMF treatments had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on sorghum agronomic traits, including plant height, stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and number of leaves. Biomass yield (both fresh and dry matter) was significantly enhanced, while the combined application of urea and AMF also improved crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber contents. These findings suggest that integrating urea fertilization with AMF inoculation can substantially enhance the productivity and forage quality of sorghum cultivated on degraded post-mining land.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea treatments significantly affected sorghum height, stem diameter, leaf dimensions and leaf number, with direction unstated.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and number of leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both urea and AMF treatments had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on sorghum agronomic traits, including plant height, stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and number of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF treatments significantly affected sorghum height, stem diameter, leaf dimensions and leaf number, with direction unstated.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
AMF treatmentse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and number of leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both urea and AMF treatments had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on sorghum agronomic traits, including plant height, stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and number of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly enhanced fresh and dry biomass yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Treatment
both urea and AMF treatmentse1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
Biomass yield (both fresh and dry matter)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass yield (both fresh and dry matter) was significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1051 · show in text ↑
e1

“both urea and AMF treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and forage quality of sorghum cultivated on degraded post-mining land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and AMF application improved crude protein, fat and fiber contents.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
combined application of urea and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application of urea and AMF also improved crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity and forage quality of sorghum cultivated on degraded post-mining land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1358 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating urea fertilization and AMF inoculation to improve sorghum productivity and forage quality on degraded mining land.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
integrating urea fertilization with AMF inoculatione0
Setting
degraded post-mining lande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrating urea fertilization with AMF inoculation can substantially enhance the productivity and forage quality of sorghum cultivated on degraded post-mining land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1358 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · SorghumResults agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.