Paper · 1990 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Mineral uptake and growth of sorghum colonized with VA mycorrhiza at varied soil phosphorus levels

P. S. Raju; R. B. Clark; J. R. Ellis; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Mineral nutrient uptake can be enhanced in plants inoculated with vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAMF). The effects of the VAMF Glomus fasciculatum on uptake of P and other mineral nutrients in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] were determined in greenhouse experiments for plants grown on a low P (3.6 mg kg‐1) soil (Typic Argiudolls) with P added at 0, 12.5, 25.0, and 37.5 mg kg‐1 soil. Enhancements of growth and mineral nutrient uptake because of the VAMF association decreased as soil applications of P increased above 12.5 nig kg‐1 soil. Root colonization with VAMF without added soil P resulted in increased dry matter yield equivalent to 12.5 mg P kg‐1 soil (25 kg P ha‐1). Total root length colonized with VAMF decreased as soil P level increased. Regardless of P added to the soil, mycorrhizal plants had higher leaf P concentrations and contents than did nonmycorrhizal plants. Enhanced contents, but not necessarily concentrations, of the other mineral nutrients were noted in shoots of mycorrhizal compared to nonmycorrhizal plants. Mycorrhizal plants had enhanced shoot contents of P, K, Zn, and Cu which could not be accounted for by increased growth. The VAMF associations with sorghum roots enhanced mineral nutrient uptake when P was sufficiently low in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal enhancements of growth and mineral uptake declined as applied soil phosphorus rose above 12.5 mg kg−1.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil applications of Pe0
Interactor
VAMFe0symbiont
Outcome
growth and mineral nutrient uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
above 12.5 nig kg‐1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhancements of growth and mineral nutrient uptake because of the VAMF association decreased as soil applications of P increased above 12.5 nig kg‐1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without added phosphorus, VAMF colonization raised dry matter yield to the equivalent of 12.5 mg P kg−1 soil.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Root colonization with VAMFe0
Interactor
VAMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.5 mg P kg‐1 soile0
Comparator
without added soil Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization with VAMF without added soil P resulted in increased dry matter yield equivalent to 12.5 mg P kg‐1 soil (25 kg P ha‐1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonized root length decreased as soil phosphorus increased.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil P levele0
Interactor
VAMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Total root length colonized with VAMFe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total root length colonized with VAMF decreased as soil P level increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants had higher leaf phosphorus concentration and content than nonmycorrhizal plants regardless of applied phosphorus.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
leaf P concentrations and contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of P added to the soil, mycorrhizal plants had higher leaf P concentrations and contents than did nonmycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal shoots had enhanced content of other mineral nutrients relative to nonmycorrhizal shoots.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
contents, but not necessarily concentrations, of the other mineral nutrientse0
Direction
Enhancede0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced contents, but not necessarily concentrations, of the other mineral nutrients were noted in shoots of mycorrhizal compared to nonmycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced shoot phosphorus, potassium and zinc contents in mycorrhizal plants were not accounted for by growth.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Interactor
Mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
shoot contents of P, K, Zn, and Cue0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
could not be accounted for by increased growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal plants had enhanced shoot contents of P, K, Zn, and Cu which could not be accounted for by increased growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · SorghumResults agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.