Claim · model-written summary
Each tested index had drawbacks limiting general acceptance.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- shortcomings which could preclude its general acceptancee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“each of these indices had shortcomings which could preclude its general acceptance as a useful indicator of sulphur status”
t0“wheat”
Title
The diagnosis of sulphur deficiency in wheat
JR Freney; K Spencer; MB Jones Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1978. doi:10.1071/ar9780727
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Association All four measured indices related strongly to current and subsequent sulphur status.
- Method / resource Amide nitrogen had the greatest relative change between deficient and adequate plants.
- Method / resource Amide nitrogen was the most sensitive sulphur index.
- Method / resource The sulphate share of total sulphur was the most promising status index.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen supply did not affect the sulphate share criterion.
- Association Plant age did not affect the sulphate share criterion.
- Recommendation Wheat with over one-tenth of its sulphur as sulphate was considered adequately supplied.