Claim · model-written summary
Ripening irrigation did not significantly change fruit yield.
- Taxon
- melon
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis melot0 - Treatment
- Carrying on the irrigation during the ripening periode0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Carrying on the irrigation during the ripening period furthered shoot growth except P_{100} application, did not significantly affect fruit yield and the soluble solids content of the fruit flesh.”
t0“melon”
Title
OSMAN YILDIRIM; NİLGÜN HALLORAN; ŞEYDA ÇAVUŞOĞLU; et al. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2009. doi:10.3906/tar-0806-19
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Continuing irrigation into ripening increased shoot growth except under full irrigation.
- Intervention effect Ripening irrigation did not significantly change fruit flesh soluble solids.
- Intervention effect IS_r and IS_h produced relatively larger fruit size.
- Intervention effect IS_r and IS_h produced relatively heavier fruit.
- Intervention effect P75 and P100 yields were similar.
- Intervention effect P75 and P100 yields exceeded P50.
- Intervention effect P75 gave higher soluble solids content.
- Intervention effect P75 gave higher sensory characteristic ratings.
- Recommendation Authors recommended IS_r P75 as most convenient for yield and quality.
- Observation IS_r P75 used 319.6-331.1 mm irrigation water.
- Observation IS_r P75 had 427.1-472.6 mm seasonal evapotranspiration.
- Observation IS_r P75 had 8.9-9.2 kg m-3 water use efficiency.