Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium chloride extended tomato fruit shelf life 2.3 to 3.8-fold versus untreated fruit.

A claim from Preharvest calcium chloride application improves postharvest keeping quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride extended tomato fruit shelf life 2.3 to 3.8-fold versus untreated fruit.

Treatment
Calcium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
shelf life of fruitse0
Direction
extensione0
Value
2.3 to 3.8-folde0
Comparator
non-treated onese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride treatment resulted in a 2.3 to 3.8-fold extension of shelf life of fruits compared to non-treated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1215
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86

Title

Preharvest calcium chloride application improves postharvest keeping quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

W. A. M. Daundasekera; G. L. S. G. Liyanage; R. Y. Wijerathne; et al. Ceylon Journal of Science (Biological Sciences) 2015. doi:10.4038/cjsbs.v44i1.7341

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-993e814fa829f6d6ede4d8dca1c64195cc9d3d1d24e6784e613c193f78e42c8b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.