Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nanofertilizers reduced lettuce dry biomass by 30–65% compared with controls.

A claim from Phytotoxic Effects and Agricultural Potential of Nanofertilizers: A Study Using Zeolite, Zinc Oxide, and Titanium Dioxide Under Controlled Conditions · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizers reduced lettuce dry biomass by 30–65% compared with controls.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Nanofertilizerse3
Outcome
dry biomasse4
Direction
decreasese4
Value
30–65%e4
Comparator
controlse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using Lactuca sativa seeds under adapted OECD-208 protocol conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–422
e3

“Nanofertilizers caused 45–78% reductions in root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1002
e4

“30–65% decreases in dry biomass compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1061

Title

Phytotoxic Effects and Agricultural Potential of Nanofertilizers: A Study Using Zeolite, Zinc Oxide, and Titanium Dioxide Under Controlled Conditions

Ezequiel Zamora-Ledezma; Glenda Leonela Loor Aragundi; Willian Stalyn Guamán Marquines; et al. Journal of Xenobiotics 2025. doi:10.3390/jox15040123

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9951a19e70fbd02b6449d7ef005afcf829ad70c9b525597ed0cab531a129ae1b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.